Systemic Functional Linguistics Tools in Translation Training With Examples From French-Greek Translations

Using as a springboard the principle that there is necessarily an ongoing linguistic process during the translation process, it is necessary to determine which tools of language science could better serve translation training. From these tools, we selected some key notions of Halliday's systemic functional linguistics (SFL) to analyze the source text (ST) and evaluate its transfer to target text (TT). More specifically, we investigated the influence of context on the variation of use (Halliday, 1978), the factors such as field, tenor, and mode on which the choice of register depends (Halliday, 2003); and the cohesion/coherence of the discourse as a whole (Halliday & Hasan, 1976). The core notion is to carry out a so-called top-down analysis. After analyzing the ST as an organized entity using markers carefully chosen by its author, we proceed to analyzing the choices made at the register level while also considering the communication situation. The translation process begins once the TT context has been determined and equivalences in ST have been sought. The contained examples used for this approach are text excerpts translated from French to Greek.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistics and the Human Sciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/lhs-2025-0003
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic Functional Linguistics Tools in Translation Training With Examples From French-Greek Translations

Maria Tsigou
Linguistics and the Human Sciences
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Systemic Functional Linguistics Tools in Translation Training With Examples From French-Greek Translations

Maria Tsigou
article en

Abstract

Using as a springboard the principle that there is necessarily an ongoing linguistic process during the translation process, it is necessary to determine which tools of language science could better serve translation training. From these tools, we selected some key notions of Halliday's systemic functional linguistics (SFL) to analyze the source text (ST) and evaluate its transfer to target text (TT). More specifically, we investigated the influence of context on the variation of use (Halliday, 1978), the factors such as field, tenor, and mode on which the choice of register depends (Halliday, 2003); and the cohesion/coherence of the discourse as a whole (Halliday & Hasan, 1976). The core notion is to carry out a so-called top-down analysis. After analyzing the ST as an organized entity using markers carefully chosen by its author, we proceed to analyzing the choices made at the register level while also considering the communication situation. The translation process begins once the TT context has been determined and equivalences in ST have been sought. The contained examples used for this approach are text excerpts translated from French to Greek.

Linguistics and the Human SciencesVol. 17(1)
Ionian University (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.