A comparative analysis of the ACPE accreditation standards and the FIP developmental goals and impact on pharmacy education

Background: This study aims to compare the 2025 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) standards and the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) developmental goals. Tracking similarities and differences between international pharmacy organisations may encourage collaboration and symmetry in advancing pharmacy education. Methods: The review occurred in three phases. Five authors individually examined the ACPE standards and FIP DGs, aiming for consensus on the comparison of ACPE subdomains with FIP elements. In the second phase, the same reviewers evaluated each other's mappings as a group. Finally, two reviewers confirmed the validity of the mapping results. Results: The mapping showed similarities between the two frameworks, with varying matches. The proportion of ACPE subdomains aligned with FIP DG elements ranged from 5% to 33%. The “Curriculum” standard aligned most significantly with FIP goals, covering DGs 1, 5, 7, 8, 15, 17, and 19, which accounted for 33%. “Experiential learning” matched FIP goals 1, 2, 4, 9, 14, and 18, totalling 29%, while “Assessment” fully aligned with the FIP goals. Conclusion: This review's findings could prompt accrediting bodies and pharmacy educators to unify standards and goals, fostering knowledge exchange and innovation. This collaboration would support the sustainable development of the pharmacy profession and address changing patient needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacy Education
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2025.251.353358
Primary Topic
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of the ACPE accreditation standards and the FIP developmental goals and impact on pharmacy education

Suleiman I. Sharif, Taha Hussein Musa, Khalid A. Mohamad, Riad Mohammed Abdelrahman et al.
1 links
Pharmacy Education
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
article

A comparative analysis of the ACPE accreditation standards and the FIP developmental goals and impact on pharmacy education

Suleiman I. Sharif, Taha Hussein Musa, Khalid A. Mohamad, Riad Mohammed Abdelrahman, Ismail Adam Arbab, Mohsen Hussein Suliman
article en

Abstract

Background: This study aims to compare the 2025 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) standards and the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) developmental goals. Tracking similarities and differences between international pharmacy organisations may encourage collaboration and symmetry in advancing pharmacy education. Methods: The review occurred in three phases. Five authors individually examined the ACPE standards and FIP DGs, aiming for consensus on the comparison of ACPE subdomains with FIP elements. In the second phase, the same reviewers evaluated each other's mappings as a group. Finally, two reviewers confirmed the validity of the mapping results. Results: The mapping showed similarities between the two frameworks, with varying matches. The proportion of ACPE subdomains aligned with FIP DG elements ranged from 5% to 33%. The “Curriculum” standard aligned most significantly with FIP goals, covering DGs 1, 5, 7, 8, 15, 17, and 19, which accounted for 33%. “Experiential learning” matched FIP goals 1, 2, 4, 9, 14, and 18, totalling 29%, while “Assessment” fully aligned with the FIP goals. Conclusion: This review's findings could prompt accrediting bodies and pharmacy educators to unify standards and goals, fostering knowledge exchange and innovation. This collaboration would support the sustainable development of the pharmacy profession and address changing patient needs.

Pharmacy EducationVol. 25(1)
Libyan International Medical University (LY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.