Scrutinizing Seclusion: Recommendations for How to Protect Patients from Unwarranted Isolation

Seclusion consists of isolating a patient within a particular space and preventing them from leaving. While framed as a short-term strategy for preventing a patient from harming themselves or others, seclusion is used in ways that are ultimately harmful. The authors argue that administrative law should more strictly limit the use of seclusion techniques in hospital settings. They first outline the harmful impacts of seclusion on those who experience it. Next, they provide an overview of the current statutory framework; and they show that there is no regulatory body to ensure that the few existing guidelines are followed in practice. Finally, the authors make two key recommendations: 1) to establish a consistent definition of seclusion, guidelines for how and when to use it, and an oversight mechanism that ensures compliance; and 2) to promote changes within the medical profession, ensuring that patients and practitioners are well-informed about their respective rights and obligations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Studies An International and Interdisciplinary Journal
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51357/cs.v19i1.289
Primary Topic
Patient Dignity and Privacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scrutinizing Seclusion: Recommendations for How to Protect Patients from Unwarranted Isolation

R. H. BOYD, John Rinaldi
2 links
Critical Studies An International and Interdisciplinary Journal
Patient Dignity and Privacy
article

Scrutinizing Seclusion: Recommendations for How to Protect Patients from Unwarranted Isolation

R. H. BOYD, John Rinaldi
article en

Abstract

Seclusion consists of isolating a patient within a particular space and preventing them from leaving. While framed as a short-term strategy for preventing a patient from harming themselves or others, seclusion is used in ways that are ultimately harmful. The authors argue that administrative law should more strictly limit the use of seclusion techniques in hospital settings. They first outline the harmful impacts of seclusion on those who experience it. Next, they provide an overview of the current statutory framework; and they show that there is no regulatory body to ensure that the few existing guidelines are followed in practice. Finally, the authors make two key recommendations: 1) to establish a consistent definition of seclusion, guidelines for how and when to use it, and an oversight mechanism that ensures compliance; and 2) to promote changes within the medical profession, ensuring that patients and practitioners are well-informed about their respective rights and obligations.

Critical Studies An International and Interdisciplinary JournalVol. 19(1)
Institute for Legal Studies (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Patient Dignity and Privacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.