Understanding farm-level diversity to guide soil fertility management in West African cotton systems: Evidence from Benin

Although cotton cultivation grants farmers access to annual inputs of mineral fertilisers, there is a generalised tendency of soil fertility decline in Benin's cotton-growing area. This study aimed to understand the link between farm socioeconomic diversity, soil management practices, and soil fertility status in cotton-based farming system of Benin. Socio-demographic and farm management data were collected from 242 farms on three sites in southern-central and northern Benin. Principal component analysis and a hierarchical clustering were used to construct a farm typology. Soil management practices were analysed in the light of this typology. Composite soil samples 20 cm deep were then taken from 40 plots representing the farm/soil types identified, to assess variability in soil fertility as influenced by farm types and management practices. Four farm types emerged, differing in resource endowments and soil management practices. Practices such as manure application (92 %) and rotational herd corralling (42 %) were adopted more often by livestock owners. Farms without livestock implemented practices such as crop rotation (90 %) and intercropping (41 %). Soil fertility status was low to very low in all farms sampled across the three sites (extractable phosphorus &lt;10 mg P/kg soil, soil organic matter &lt; 20 g kg<sup>−1</sup> soil). Although a link between farms’ soil management practices and soil fertility status was expected, no statistical differences were detected across farm types (p &gt; 0.05). Cotton yields, as declared by farmers, were also not statistically associated with soil fertility levels. The generalized poor fertility status of soils that receive annual fertilizer inputs suggests that this practice is not enough to maintain long-term soil productivity in the climatic and soil conditions of Benin cotton zones studied here. This was also the case in fields that received combinations of mineral fertiliser and animal manure, which is probably not used in sufficient quantity and quality. Low organic matter inputs, crop residue removal and conventional tillage, as practiced by the majority of farmers in our study sites (100 %), may contribute to explain the low levels of SOM and organically-held nutrients in the soil. Alternative measures to maintain soil fertility should be further investigated locally for their capacity to restore and maintain soil fertility in the long term and to improve crop yields, considering the socioeconomic diversity of farms and their environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109749
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding farm-level diversity to guide soil fertility management in West African cotton systems: Evidence from Benin

Rodrigue V.C. Diogo, Pierrot Lionel Yemadje, David Berre, Pablo Adrián Tittonell et al.
3 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
14.50
article

Understanding farm-level diversity to guide soil fertility management in West African cotton systems: Evidence from Benin

Rodrigue V.C. Diogo, Pierrot Lionel Yemadje, David Berre, Pablo Adrián Tittonell, G. I. Anita Dossouhoui
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Although cotton cultivation grants farmers access to annual inputs of mineral fertilisers, there is a generalised tendency of soil fertility decline in Benin's cotton-growing area. This study aimed to understand the link between farm socioeconomic diversity, soil management practices, and soil fertility status in cotton-based farming system of Benin. Socio-demographic and farm management data were collected from 242 farms on three sites in southern-central and northern Benin. Principal component analysis and a hierarchical clustering were used to construct a farm typology. Soil management practices were analysed in the light of this typology. Composite soil samples 20 cm deep were then taken from 40 plots representing the farm/soil types identified, to assess variability in soil fertility as influenced by farm types and management practices. Four farm types emerged, differing in resource endowments and soil management practices. Practices such as manure application (92 %) and rotational herd corralling (42 %) were adopted more often by livestock owners. Farms without livestock implemented practices such as crop rotation (90 %) and intercropping (41 %). Soil fertility status was low to very low in all farms sampled across the three sites (extractable phosphorus &lt;10 mg P/kg soil, soil organic matter &lt; 20 g kg<sup>−1</sup> soil). Although a link between farms’ soil management practices and soil fertility status was expected, no statistical differences were detected across farm types (p &gt; 0.05). Cotton yields, as declared by farmers, were also not statistically associated with soil fertility levels. The generalized poor fertility status of soils that receive annual fertilizer inputs suggests that this practice is not enough to maintain long-term soil productivity in the climatic and soil conditions of Benin cotton zones studied here. This was also the case in fields that received combinations of mineral fertiliser and animal manure, which is probably not used in sufficient quantity and quality. Low organic matter inputs, crop residue removal and conventional tillage, as practiced by the majority of farmers in our study sites (100 %), may contribute to explain the low levels of SOM and organically-held nutrients in the soil. Alternative measures to maintain soil fertility should be further investigated locally for their capacity to restore and maintain soil fertility in the long term and to improve crop yields, considering the socioeconomic diversity of farms and their environment.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 392
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Agence Française de Développement
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
14.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.