Integrating multiple indices of habitat quality to inform habitat management for a sagebrush indicator species

Robust science is needed to inform natural resource management and policy decisions. Predictive species habitat maps are frequently employed in conservation decision-making but are often based on a single metric representing habitat quality. We outlined a framework that combines multiple spatially explicit indices of potential habitat quality that could be used to identify and prioritize habitat management areas, using the greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ; hereafter sage-grouse) as an example species. Due to large-scale changes in sagebrush ecosystems, sage-grouse have suffered significant population declines in recent decades and have become key to land management plans throughout the western United States, where comprehensive habitat maps are crucial to effective conservation efforts. We evaluated habitat selection and survival patterns of sage-grouse across six distinct annual life stages and seasons to generate predictive habitat map surfaces, mapped the distribution of current occupancy, and combined maps of potential selection and survival patterns with space use and occupancy indices to delineate example habitat management categories. Our approach facilitates identification of priority areas to target for habitat preservation and areas where anthropogenic impacts could occur with likely minimal impact to the species. Overall, by combining indices representing selection, survival, and current occupancy, we provide a framework to allow for a flexible and targeted management approach that could be adapted to a wide variety of species. • We combined indices of habitat selection, survival and current occupancy. • Our approach helps identify priority areas to target for habitat preservation. • We also identify areas where impacts could occur with likely minimal impact. • Combining multiple indices allows for a flexible and targeted management approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Informatics
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103228
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating multiple indices of habitat quality to inform habitat management for a sagebrush indicator species

Peter S. Coates, Michael L. Casazza, Shawn T. O’Neil, Megan C. Milligan et al.
2 citations
Ecological Informatics
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
3.43
article

Integrating multiple indices of habitat quality to inform habitat management for a sagebrush indicator species

Peter S. Coates, Michael L. Casazza, Shawn T. O’Neil, Megan C. Milligan, Derek Friend, Kathleen Steele, Brianne E. Brussee, Michael P. Chenaille, Katherine A. Miller, Timothy S. Bowden, Justin R. Small, Arlene D. Kosic
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Robust science is needed to inform natural resource management and policy decisions. Predictive species habitat maps are frequently employed in conservation decision-making but are often based on a single metric representing habitat quality. We outlined a framework that combines multiple spatially explicit indices of potential habitat quality that could be used to identify and prioritize habitat management areas, using the greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ; hereafter sage-grouse) as an example species. Due to large-scale changes in sagebrush ecosystems, sage-grouse have suffered significant population declines in recent decades and have become key to land management plans throughout the western United States, where comprehensive habitat maps are crucial to effective conservation efforts. We evaluated habitat selection and survival patterns of sage-grouse across six distinct annual life stages and seasons to generate predictive habitat map surfaces, mapped the distribution of current occupancy, and combined maps of potential selection and survival patterns with space use and occupancy indices to delineate example habitat management categories. Our approach facilitates identification of priority areas to target for habitat preservation and areas where anthropogenic impacts could occur with likely minimal impact to the species. Overall, by combining indices representing selection, survival, and current occupancy, we provide a framework to allow for a flexible and targeted management approach that could be adapted to a wide variety of species. • We combined indices of habitat selection, survival and current occupancy. • Our approach helps identify priority areas to target for habitat preservation. • We also identify areas where impacts could occur with likely minimal impact. • Combining multiple indices allows for a flexible and targeted management approach.

Ecological InformaticsVol. 90
United States Geological Survey (US), Bureau of Land Management (US), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US), Nevada Department of Wildlife (US), Western Ecological Research Center
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.