Annotation of biological samples data to standard ontologies with support from large language models

The semantic integration of biological data is hindered by the vast heterogeneity of data sources and their limited semantic formalization. A crucial step in this process is mapping data elements to ontological concepts, which typically involves substantial manual effort. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in automating complex language-related tasks and may offer a solution to streamline biological data annotation. This study investigates the utility of LLMs-specifically various base and fine-tuned GPT models-for the automatic assignment of ontological identifiers to biological sample labels. We evaluated model performance in annotating labels to four widely used ontologies: the Cell Line Ontology (CLO), Cell Ontology (CL), Uber-anatomy Ontology (UBERON), and BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO). Our dataset was compiled from publicly available, high-quality databases containing biologically relevant sequence information, which suffers from inconsistent annotation practices, complicating integrative analyses. Model outputs were compared against annotations generated by text2term, a state-of-the-art annotation tool. The fine-tuned GPT model outperformed both the base models and text2term in annotating cell lines and cell types, particularly for the CL and UBERON ontologies, achieving a precision of 47-64% and a recall of 88-97%. In contrast, base models exhibited significantly lower performance. These results suggest that fine-tuned LLMs can accelerate and improve the accuracy of biological data annotation. Nonetheless, our evaluation highlights persistent challenges, including variable precision across ontology categories and the continued need for expert curation to ensure annotation validity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2025.05.020
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Annotation of biological samples data to standard ontologies with support from large language models

Juan Mulero-Hernández, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández‐Breis, Andrea Riquelme-García
7 citations
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
5.64
article

Annotation of biological samples data to standard ontologies with support from large language models

Juan Mulero-Hernández, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández‐Breis, Andrea Riquelme-García
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The semantic integration of biological data is hindered by the vast heterogeneity of data sources and their limited semantic formalization. A crucial step in this process is mapping data elements to ontological concepts, which typically involves substantial manual effort. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in automating complex language-related tasks and may offer a solution to streamline biological data annotation. This study investigates the utility of LLMs-specifically various base and fine-tuned GPT models-for the automatic assignment of ontological identifiers to biological sample labels. We evaluated model performance in annotating labels to four widely used ontologies: the Cell Line Ontology (CLO), Cell Ontology (CL), Uber-anatomy Ontology (UBERON), and BRENDA Tissue Ontology (BTO). Our dataset was compiled from publicly available, high-quality databases containing biologically relevant sequence information, which suffers from inconsistent annotation practices, complicating integrative analyses. Model outputs were compared against annotations generated by text2term, a state-of-the-art annotation tool. The fine-tuned GPT model outperformed both the base models and text2term in annotating cell lines and cell types, particularly for the CL and UBERON ontologies, achieving a precision of 47-64% and a recall of 88-97%. In contrast, base models exhibited significantly lower performance. These results suggest that fine-tuned LLMs can accelerate and improve the accuracy of biological data annotation. Nonetheless, our evaluation highlights persistent challenges, including variable precision across ontology categories and the continued need for expert curation to ensure annotation validity.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalVol. 27
Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
5.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Annotation of biological samples data to standard ontologies with support from large language models — Juan Mulero-Hernández, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández‐Breis, et al. · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS