Strengthening the Rule of Law: Role of the Finance Commission

This paper examines an essential yet underexplored aspect of judicial reform in India – the budgeting process and the allocation of funds to the judiciary. By analysing the budgetary allocation towards the judiciary at both the union and state government level, this paper reveals both a vertical disparity (between the union and state governments) and horizontal disparities (across the states) in budgetary allocation towards the judiciary in India. The paper utilises several metrics (pending cases per lakh population, judicial expenditure per capita, expenditure per subordinate court, case burden per subordinate court, etc.) to understand the disparity of public funding of judiciary from various dimensions. The paper also highlights archaic budgeting processes and severe underutilisation of funds, and underscores the role of the Finance Commission in addressing funding disparities and improving budgetary practices. The paper proposes reform measures to the Sixteenth Finance Commission to improve the budgeting for the judiciary, allocation of money to courts, and the utilisation of funds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Public Policy Review
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55763/ippr.2025.06.02.002
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengthening the Rule of Law: Role of the Finance Commission

Surya Prakash B S, C.H. Rohith
Indian Public Policy Review
European and International Law Studies
article

Strengthening the Rule of Law: Role of the Finance Commission

Surya Prakash B S, C.H. Rohith
article en

Abstract

This paper examines an essential yet underexplored aspect of judicial reform in India – the budgeting process and the allocation of funds to the judiciary. By analysing the budgetary allocation towards the judiciary at both the union and state government level, this paper reveals both a vertical disparity (between the union and state governments) and horizontal disparities (across the states) in budgetary allocation towards the judiciary in India. The paper utilises several metrics (pending cases per lakh population, judicial expenditure per capita, expenditure per subordinate court, case burden per subordinate court, etc.) to understand the disparity of public funding of judiciary from various dimensions. The paper also highlights archaic budgeting processes and severe underutilisation of funds, and underscores the role of the Finance Commission in addressing funding disparities and improving budgetary practices. The paper proposes reform measures to the Sixteenth Finance Commission to improve the budgeting for the judiciary, allocation of money to courts, and the utilisation of funds.

Indian Public Policy ReviewVol. 6(2)
International School of Dakar (SN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.