Agroforestry practices, adoption factors, and livelihood contributions among smallholder farmers in Didu district, southwestern Ethiopia

Agroforestry (AF) has the potential to deliver for rural livelihoods, environmental sustainability, and climate change adaptation and mitigation. Little attention has been paid to smallholder farmers’ perceptions, adoption levels with barriers, and influencing factors. This study examines how adoption is determined and the livelihood contribution of AF practices among smallholder farmers in Didu District, Southwestern Ethiopia. This study employed a mixed-method cross-sectional design. Using a multi-stage sampling procedure, 296 respondents (174 adopters and 122 non-adopters) were selected. The collected data were analyzed using thematic, descriptive, and inferential methods. Farmers adopted various AF practices in different home gardens (36%), scattered trees in croplands (29.71%), boundary tree planting (16%), and hedgerows (2.29%). The major barriers to AF adoption were the lack of extension services (98.3%), limited land (97%), and inaccessible markets (94%). A binary logistic regression analysis was adopted, and it was positively influenced by wealth level (p<0.01), level of education, size of the farm, slope of the farmland, extension relations, and farming experiences (p<0.05) and negatively by distance from home to farmland (p<0.05). Analysis of the net profit margin also showed that practice adopters had higher profitability rates than non-adopters (16.54% vs. 9%), and the AF reported economic benefits to smallholder farmers in the study area. The results showed that the diversified nature of smallholder farmers’ livelihoods in the area was largely supported by AF practices. Through AF practices, society has experienced diminished poverty levels together with enhanced food accessibility, and farmers have achieved better earnings and living conditions. This study proposes strategies to enhance AF as a base for enduring socioeconomic progress and supervision of natural resources. • Diverse Agroforestry Practices (Farmers adopt home gardens, alley cropping, and hedgerows, enhancing biodiversity and soil health0. • Factors Influencing Adoption ( Education, farm size, slope, and extension services boost adoption, while distance hinders it). • Economic and Livelihood Benefits (Agroforestry increases farmers' income and spending on medical and education needs). • Poverty Reduction & Food Security ( Agroforestry diversifies income sources, reducing poverty and improving food security). • Policy Recommendations ( Strengthen services, integrate fast-growing trees, and enhance market access for sustainability).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102052
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agroforestry practices, adoption factors, and livelihood contributions among smallholder farmers in Didu district, southwestern Ethiopia

Mamush Masha, Alemayehu Abera, Elias Bojago, Teshome Lidatu
6 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
18.16
article

Agroforestry practices, adoption factors, and livelihood contributions among smallholder farmers in Didu district, southwestern Ethiopia

Mamush Masha, Alemayehu Abera, Elias Bojago, Teshome Lidatu
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Agroforestry (AF) has the potential to deliver for rural livelihoods, environmental sustainability, and climate change adaptation and mitigation. Little attention has been paid to smallholder farmers’ perceptions, adoption levels with barriers, and influencing factors. This study examines how adoption is determined and the livelihood contribution of AF practices among smallholder farmers in Didu District, Southwestern Ethiopia. This study employed a mixed-method cross-sectional design. Using a multi-stage sampling procedure, 296 respondents (174 adopters and 122 non-adopters) were selected. The collected data were analyzed using thematic, descriptive, and inferential methods. Farmers adopted various AF practices in different home gardens (36%), scattered trees in croplands (29.71%), boundary tree planting (16%), and hedgerows (2.29%). The major barriers to AF adoption were the lack of extension services (98.3%), limited land (97%), and inaccessible markets (94%). A binary logistic regression analysis was adopted, and it was positively influenced by wealth level (p<0.01), level of education, size of the farm, slope of the farmland, extension relations, and farming experiences (p<0.05) and negatively by distance from home to farmland (p<0.05). Analysis of the net profit margin also showed that practice adopters had higher profitability rates than non-adopters (16.54% vs. 9%), and the AF reported economic benefits to smallholder farmers in the study area. The results showed that the diversified nature of smallholder farmers’ livelihoods in the area was largely supported by AF practices. Through AF practices, society has experienced diminished poverty levels together with enhanced food accessibility, and farmers have achieved better earnings and living conditions. This study proposes strategies to enhance AF as a base for enduring socioeconomic progress and supervision of natural resources. • Diverse Agroforestry Practices (Farmers adopt home gardens, alley cropping, and hedgerows, enhancing biodiversity and soil health0. • Factors Influencing Adoption ( Education, farm size, slope, and extension services boost adoption, while distance hinders it). • Economic and Livelihood Benefits (Agroforestry increases farmers' income and spending on medical and education needs). • Poverty Reduction & Food Security ( Agroforestry diversifies income sources, reducing poverty and improving food security). • Policy Recommendations ( Strengthen services, integrate fast-growing trees, and enhance market access for sustainability).

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 22
Ethiopian Civil Service University (ET), Wolaita Sodo University (ET), Mattu University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
18.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.