Evolution and objectives of diverse Australian recreational fisheries monitoring programs

Abstract Approximately half a billion people engage in recreational fishing, and are estimated to capture at least 10 million tons of fish annually, equivalent to 12% of the global fish catch. However, the recreational fishing sector can be difficult to monitor due to the lack of mandatory reporting of catch and participation. Australia, where one in five adults, or 4.2 million people, participate in recreational fishing annually, highlighted the need to collect information and monitor recreational fishing activity, catch, fish biology, and economic and social values in its 1994 ‘National Policy for Recreational Fishing.’ Here, we identify past and present Australian recreational fisheries monitoring programs (RFMPs) and provide a comprehensive overview of their objectives and methodologies, specifically considering their alignment with the four key research foci identified in the ‘National Policy for Recreational Fishing in Australia.’ We identified 40 unique marine state-wide multi-species RFMPs across all Australian states and territories. Most RFMPs focus on collecting catch, fishing activity and social and economic values information, and rarely contribute information on fish biology. However, there has been ongoing expansions in the number and scope of RFMPs, and an increasing proportion of offsite (i.e., information collected outside the fishing location) programs. While offsite monitoring programs are often cost-effective, we emphasize the crucial role played by onsite monitoring surveys. Results from this review can be used in plans for further expanding recreational monitoring programs towards a more comprehensive and in depth understanding of the recreational fisheries sector in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-025-09955-6
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution and objectives of diverse Australian recreational fisheries monitoring programs

Shaun White, Morgan S. Pratchett, Amos Mapleston, Reniel B. Cabral
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Evolution and objectives of diverse Australian recreational fisheries monitoring programs

Shaun White, Morgan S. Pratchett, Amos Mapleston, Reniel B. Cabral
article en

Abstract

Abstract Approximately half a billion people engage in recreational fishing, and are estimated to capture at least 10 million tons of fish annually, equivalent to 12% of the global fish catch. However, the recreational fishing sector can be difficult to monitor due to the lack of mandatory reporting of catch and participation. Australia, where one in five adults, or 4.2 million people, participate in recreational fishing annually, highlighted the need to collect information and monitor recreational fishing activity, catch, fish biology, and economic and social values in its 1994 ‘National Policy for Recreational Fishing.’ Here, we identify past and present Australian recreational fisheries monitoring programs (RFMPs) and provide a comprehensive overview of their objectives and methodologies, specifically considering their alignment with the four key research foci identified in the ‘National Policy for Recreational Fishing in Australia.’ We identified 40 unique marine state-wide multi-species RFMPs across all Australian states and territories. Most RFMPs focus on collecting catch, fishing activity and social and economic values information, and rarely contribute information on fish biology. However, there has been ongoing expansions in the number and scope of RFMPs, and an increasing proportion of offsite (i.e., information collected outside the fishing location) programs. While offsite monitoring programs are often cost-effective, we emphasize the crucial role played by onsite monitoring surveys. Results from this review can be used in plans for further expanding recreational monitoring programs towards a more comprehensive and in depth understanding of the recreational fisheries sector in Australia.

Reviews in Fish Biology and FisheriesVol. 35(3)
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), James Cook University (AU)
James Cook University
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.