Evaluating Regression Models for Project Forecasting: A Comparative Analysis of Linear and Polynomial Approaches with Monte Carlo Simulations

In this study, we investigate regression prediction schemes and apply them to planning as an extension to predicting future outcomes of projects using Monte Carlo simulations. Project completion probabilities were modeled using cumulative distribution functions (CDF) with linear and polynomial regression models. Linear regression was conducted first, but residuals revealed a high prediction error and the focus was quickly shifted to polynomial regression which increased accuracy substantially. Polynomial regression outperformed the others in capturing the non-linear data patterns and demonstrated low values of mean squared error (MSE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) by making the fitted values close to the actual prices of the test set. Offering trustworthy estimates on project completion this way helps improve decision-making. Thus, further exploration of non-linear methods might aid in maximizing the accuracy of the model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iraset64571.2025.11007999
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Regression Models for Project Forecasting: A Comparative Analysis of Linear and Polynomial Approaches with Monte Carlo Simulations

Nouzha Lamdouar, Mouna El Mkhalet, Hicham Hassi
1 citations
Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization
5.33
article

Evaluating Regression Models for Project Forecasting: A Comparative Analysis of Linear and Polynomial Approaches with Monte Carlo Simulations

Nouzha Lamdouar, Mouna El Mkhalet, Hicham Hassi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, we investigate regression prediction schemes and apply them to planning as an extension to predicting future outcomes of projects using Monte Carlo simulations. Project completion probabilities were modeled using cumulative distribution functions (CDF) with linear and polynomial regression models. Linear regression was conducted first, but residuals revealed a high prediction error and the focus was quickly shifted to polynomial regression which increased accuracy substantially. Polynomial regression outperformed the others in capturing the non-linear data patterns and demonstrated low values of mean squared error (MSE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) by making the fitted values close to the actual prices of the test set. Offering trustworthy estimates on project completion this way helps improve decision-making. Thus, further exploration of non-linear methods might aid in maximizing the accuracy of the model.

Mohammed V University (MA), Ecole Mohammadia d'Ingénieurs (MA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization
5.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Regression Models for Project Forecasting: A Comparative Analysis of Linear and Polynomial Approaches with Monte Carlo Simulations — Nouzha Lamdouar, Mouna El Mkhalet, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS