Optional and mandatory assignment strategies for dynamic vehicle routing with time windows

The Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problem (DVRP) extends the classical Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) by incorporating real-time updates, requiring continuous adjustments to routing plans. This study introduces two novel solution strategies for the DVRP with Hard Time Windows: Multi-Planning with Acception/Rejection Policy (MPA) and Multi-Planning with Mandatory Assignment Policy (MPM). Both approaches consider previously assigned, new, and simulated future customer requests, enabling more informed decision-making under dynamic conditions. In MPA, customer requests can be rejected if future requests are expected to be more advantageous, whereas MPM mandates accepting requests provided vehicle capacity is sufficient. After optimizing the methods through sensitivity analyses, we evaluated their performance against Clarke and Wright's Savings Algorithm (CW) across various real-world-inspired scenarios, including different time window lengths, interarrival times, and region types. Results show that MPA outperforms under tighter time windows and high-demand settings, while MPM demonstrates robust performance across broader conditions. The proposed methods increase the average acceptance rate by up to 81% and reduce average daily travel times by up to 48% compared to CW. Even when all methods achieve a 100% acceptance rate, MPA and MPM reduce travel times by 13% to 43%. Additionally, execution time analysis shows that shorter interarrival times and higher available vehicles significantly increase computational effort, with execution times rising up to ninefold. In contrast, variations in time window constraints have a more moderate impact, typically increasing execution times by 10% to 60%.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103462
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optional and mandatory assignment strategies for dynamic vehicle routing with time windows

Mustafa Demirbilek
1 citations
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
1.24
article

Optional and mandatory assignment strategies for dynamic vehicle routing with time windows

Mustafa Demirbilek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problem (DVRP) extends the classical Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) by incorporating real-time updates, requiring continuous adjustments to routing plans. This study introduces two novel solution strategies for the DVRP with Hard Time Windows: Multi-Planning with Acception/Rejection Policy (MPA) and Multi-Planning with Mandatory Assignment Policy (MPM). Both approaches consider previously assigned, new, and simulated future customer requests, enabling more informed decision-making under dynamic conditions. In MPA, customer requests can be rejected if future requests are expected to be more advantageous, whereas MPM mandates accepting requests provided vehicle capacity is sufficient. After optimizing the methods through sensitivity analyses, we evaluated their performance against Clarke and Wright's Savings Algorithm (CW) across various real-world-inspired scenarios, including different time window lengths, interarrival times, and region types. Results show that MPA outperforms under tighter time windows and high-demand settings, while MPM demonstrates robust performance across broader conditions. The proposed methods increase the average acceptance rate by up to 81% and reduce average daily travel times by up to 48% compared to CW. Even when all methods achieve a 100% acceptance rate, MPA and MPM reduce travel times by 13% to 43%. Additionally, execution time analysis shows that shorter interarrival times and higher available vehicles significantly increase computational effort, with execution times rising up to ninefold. In contrast, variations in time window constraints have a more moderate impact, typically increasing execution times by 10% to 60%.

Ain Shams Engineering JournalVol. 16(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.