Hybrid Machine Learning for CNC Process Monitoring

The transition to highly customized, one-off production in modern manufacturing necessitates sophisticated process monitoring to reduce waste, minimise downtime, and alleviate operator burden. Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) axes represent a fundamental component of automated manufacturing and offer a universal and accessible monitoring option through power supply data. By accurately predicting reference signals and comparing them with real-time measurements, deviations can be used for effective model-based process monitoring and anomaly detection. This study explores the efficacy of hybrid machine learning (ML) models in predicting reference signals for CNC axes using features derived from a physical model. Additionally, relevant but difficult-to-measure features such as process forces and the material removal rate (MMR) were made accessible through soft sensors. Various ML models were evaluated, including tree-based models (e.g. random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (GB)) and deep learning (DL) models (e.g. feed-forward neural networks (FNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and transformers-based models (TF)). Feature importance analysis was performed, identifying velocity, acceleration, process forces, spindle torque, andMMRas crucial predictors that influence model performance. Key results indicate that tree-based models, specifically RF and GB, consistently delivered the highest accuracy, achieving R2 up to 0.98 for translatory axes and approximately 0.89 for the main spindle. These models demonstrated robustness, outperforming deep learning approaches, particularly when trained on smaller datasets. Although DL models improved with larger data volumes, their performance remained inferior compared to tree-based methods. The study underscores the potential of the integration of physical knowledge into hybrid ML models to enhance model-based process monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3573400
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Machine Learning for CNC Process Monitoring

Alexander Puchta, Robin Ströbel, Huijuan Zhou, Samuel Deucker et al.
IEEE Access
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Hybrid Machine Learning for CNC Process Monitoring

Alexander Puchta, Robin Ströbel, Huijuan Zhou, Samuel Deucker, Benjamin Noack, Jürgen Fleischer, Hafez Kader
article en

Abstract

The transition to highly customized, one-off production in modern manufacturing necessitates sophisticated process monitoring to reduce waste, minimise downtime, and alleviate operator burden. Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) axes represent a fundamental component of automated manufacturing and offer a universal and accessible monitoring option through power supply data. By accurately predicting reference signals and comparing them with real-time measurements, deviations can be used for effective model-based process monitoring and anomaly detection. This study explores the efficacy of hybrid machine learning (ML) models in predicting reference signals for CNC axes using features derived from a physical model. Additionally, relevant but difficult-to-measure features such as process forces and the material removal rate (MMR) were made accessible through soft sensors. Various ML models were evaluated, including tree-based models (e.g. random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (GB)) and deep learning (DL) models (e.g. feed-forward neural networks (FNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and transformers-based models (TF)). Feature importance analysis was performed, identifying velocity, acceleration, process forces, spindle torque, andMMRas crucial predictors that influence model performance. Key results indicate that tree-based models, specifically RF and GB, consistently delivered the highest accuracy, achieving R2 up to 0.98 for translatory axes and approximately 0.89 for the main spindle. These models demonstrated robustness, outperforming deep learning approaches, particularly when trained on smaller datasets. Although DL models improved with larger data volumes, their performance remained inferior compared to tree-based methods. The study underscores the potential of the integration of physical knowledge into hybrid ML models to enhance model-based process monitoring.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
AiF Projekt
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.