Measuring the similarity between languages

Abstract In typology, statistical methods have been successfully used to assess similarities and differences between languages. In creole studies, the use of quantitative methods has been discussed controversially. In the debate many methodological aspects of the statistical models used have been criticized (e.g. Meakins 2022 ; Bakker 2023 ). This paper presents an investigation of two methodological problems that have not been critically looked at so far: the question of which statistical models produce which results, and the question of how the amount of missing values in data sets influences the results. We present a study in which we tested different statistical models on 21 features from two arbitrarily chosen domains (‘Word Order’ and ‘Nominal Categories’) from the WALS ( Dryer & Haspelmath, 2013 ) and APiCS ( Michaelis et al., 2013 ) data bases. It is demonstrated that different statistical methods yield similar results, and that different sample sizes do not dramatically influence the model outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24026.pla
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the similarity between languages

Ingo Plag, Lara Rüter
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Language and cultural evolution
article

Measuring the similarity between languages

Ingo Plag, Lara Rüter
article en

Abstract

Abstract In typology, statistical methods have been successfully used to assess similarities and differences between languages. In creole studies, the use of quantitative methods has been discussed controversially. In the debate many methodological aspects of the statistical models used have been criticized (e.g. Meakins 2022 ; Bakker 2023 ). This paper presents an investigation of two methodological problems that have not been critically looked at so far: the question of which statistical models produce which results, and the question of how the amount of missing values in data sets influences the results. We present a study in which we tested different statistical models on 21 features from two arbitrarily chosen domains (‘Word Order’ and ‘Nominal Categories’) from the WALS ( Dryer & Haspelmath, 2013 ) and APiCS ( Michaelis et al., 2013 ) data bases. It is demonstrated that different statistical methods yield similar results, and that different sample sizes do not dramatically influence the model outcomes.

Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Language and cultural evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.