Rethinking the road ahead – generation Z’s perspectives on AI-based mobility services

• The TRACE model identifies latent psychosocial drivers shaping Gen Z’s acceptance of autonomous vehicles. • AVs are seen by Gen Z as both liberating tools and sources of psychological discomfort, per GT analysis. • Loss of driving experience and cyberrisk fears are key psychological barriers to AV adoption. • AV design, marketing, and policy must reflect user agency, transparency, and symbolic lifestyle values. Empirical studies project that autonomous vehicles (AVs) with SAE Levels 4/5 will become widely available for passenger transport by the early 2030s. However, consumer expectations and perceived risks related to this technology remain insufficiently understood. This study addresses this gap by exploring how Generation Z – arguably the most receptive segment to Industry 4.0 innovations – perceives highly automated vehicles. Focus group interviews (n discussions = 5, n subject = 25) were conducted and analysed following the three-stage Grounded Theory method developed by Corbin – Strauss (1990). The resulting conceptual model – TRACE ( Technology-related Repertoires of Attitudes, Control, and Engagement ) – identifies critical yet under-researched factors such as alternative vehicle usage patterns, AI-scepticism, and shifting human–machine (AI) interdependence that may significantly shape AV acceptance. This research offers a theoretical contribution to the field of human–technology interaction and practical insights for stakeholders aiming to accelerate the socially responsible diffusion of AVs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101475
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking the road ahead – generation Z’s perspectives on AI-based mobility services

Márk Miskolczi, Melinda Jászberényi, László Kökény
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Rethinking the road ahead – generation Z’s perspectives on AI-based mobility services

Márk Miskolczi, Melinda Jászberényi, László Kökény
article en

Abstract

• The TRACE model identifies latent psychosocial drivers shaping Gen Z’s acceptance of autonomous vehicles. • AVs are seen by Gen Z as both liberating tools and sources of psychological discomfort, per GT analysis. • Loss of driving experience and cyberrisk fears are key psychological barriers to AV adoption. • AV design, marketing, and policy must reflect user agency, transparency, and symbolic lifestyle values. Empirical studies project that autonomous vehicles (AVs) with SAE Levels 4/5 will become widely available for passenger transport by the early 2030s. However, consumer expectations and perceived risks related to this technology remain insufficiently understood. This study addresses this gap by exploring how Generation Z – arguably the most receptive segment to Industry 4.0 innovations – perceives highly automated vehicles. Focus group interviews (n discussions = 5, n subject = 25) were conducted and analysed following the three-stage Grounded Theory method developed by Corbin – Strauss (1990). The resulting conceptual model – TRACE ( Technology-related Repertoires of Attitudes, Control, and Engagement ) – identifies critical yet under-researched factors such as alternative vehicle usage patterns, AI-scepticism, and shifting human–machine (AI) interdependence that may significantly shape AV acceptance. This research offers a theoretical contribution to the field of human–technology interaction and practical insights for stakeholders aiming to accelerate the socially responsible diffusion of AVs.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 31
Corvinus University of Budapest (HU)
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal, National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.