Low-Cost Assistive Technology at the Cross-Cut of Education and Health

Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the types of assistive technology (AT) or low-cost assistive devices developed in the areas of education and health, with an emphasis on their design, implementation and resignification processes in the contexts of people with disabilities. Theoretical Framework: The research is based on the concepts of AT as a technical-social mediation that expands the functionality, autonomy and participation of people with disabilities. It is supported by authors such as Bastos et al. (2023), Howard et al. (2021) and the definition of the Technical Aids Committee (2009), which highlights low-cost AT as an inclusive, accessible and context-sensitive tool for users. Method: The methodology adopted for this research comprises a qualitative study, based on a systematic literature review, whose approach aims to identify, describe and critically analyze the scientific records available in the databases. Results and Discussion: The results revealed a range of assistive technology such as adapted supports with PVC, Braille displays, robotic systems, smart wheelchairs and digital solutions using smartphones or artificial intelligence. The assistive technology with low-cost materials promotes functional, psychosocial and symbolic gains, reaffirming its role in autonomy, belonging and inclusion. In both education and health, the devices analyzed were developed collaboratively, with a focus on personalization, replicability and usability. Research Implications: The findings reinforce the need for public policies that encourage the production, dissemination and use of assistive technology with low-cost materials as equity and social justice strategies. The research also points to the potential of these assistive devices in promoting learning, rehabilitation and daily autonomy in contexts of resource scarcity. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by exploring a field that is still poorly systematized, gathering empirical evidence that demonstrates the effectiveness, technical feasibility, and transformative impact of assistive technology developed with low-cost materials. It values initiatives with user participation as legitimate paths for inclusive innovation.