EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS OF THE SUGARCANE AGROECOSYSTEM IN SIHOCHAC, CHAMPOTÓN, CAMPECHE, MEXICO

<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, agroecosystems (AES) face problems related to climate change, soil erosion, environmental pollution, and resource degradation that directly impact sustainability. <strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the degree of sustainability of the sugarcane agroecosystem of the community of Sihochac, Champotón, Campeche, Mexico, through the analysis and evaluation of economic, environmental and sociocultural indicators. <strong>Methodology: </strong>The MESMIS method was used to define the indicators corresponding to each dimension. The information from each was gathered based on a sample of 70 farmers, calculated through the finite population formula; a questionnaire with closed questions was applied and answers with a scale of 0 to 4. <strong>Results: </strong>The sociocultural indicators obtained the highest value with 2.32, followed by the economic with 2.14, and lastly, the environmental with 0.57. The General Sustainability Index (GSI) obtained was 1.68, which indicates that the sugarcane agroecosystem is not sustainable. <strong>Implications: </strong>The sugarcane farmers manage their agroecosystems with various conventional methods, so they require using more sustainable practices to reduce the environmental impact on this crop. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because the sugarcane AES is not sustainable, it is necessary to implement conservation measures, for example, using varieties that are more resistant to pests and diseases which require less synthetic chemical products and promoting the use of organic fertilizers, as well as fostering social relationships and fairer and more solidary support both for farmers and for representatives of sugarcane-growing groups.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.5935
Primary Topic
Plant and soil sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS OF THE SUGARCANE AGROECOSYSTEM IN SIHOCHAC, CHAMPOTÓN, CAMPECHE, MEXICO

Carolina Flota-Bañuelos, Carlos H. Ávila-Bello, Silvia Fraire-Cordero, Verónica Rosales-Martínez et al.
2 links
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
Plant and soil sciences
article

EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS OF THE SUGARCANE AGROECOSYSTEM IN SIHOCHAC, CHAMPOTÓN, CAMPECHE, MEXICO

Carolina Flota-Bañuelos, Carlos H. Ávila-Bello, Silvia Fraire-Cordero, Verónica Rosales-Martínez, L. Rosales
article en

Abstract

<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, agroecosystems (AES) face problems related to climate change, soil erosion, environmental pollution, and resource degradation that directly impact sustainability. <strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the degree of sustainability of the sugarcane agroecosystem of the community of Sihochac, Champotón, Campeche, Mexico, through the analysis and evaluation of economic, environmental and sociocultural indicators. <strong>Methodology: </strong>The MESMIS method was used to define the indicators corresponding to each dimension. The information from each was gathered based on a sample of 70 farmers, calculated through the finite population formula; a questionnaire with closed questions was applied and answers with a scale of 0 to 4. <strong>Results: </strong>The sociocultural indicators obtained the highest value with 2.32, followed by the economic with 2.14, and lastly, the environmental with 0.57. The General Sustainability Index (GSI) obtained was 1.68, which indicates that the sugarcane agroecosystem is not sustainable. <strong>Implications: </strong>The sugarcane farmers manage their agroecosystems with various conventional methods, so they require using more sustainable practices to reduce the environmental impact on this crop. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because the sugarcane AES is not sustainable, it is necessary to implement conservation measures, for example, using varieties that are more resistant to pests and diseases which require less synthetic chemical products and promoting the use of organic fertilizers, as well as fostering social relationships and fairer and more solidary support both for farmers and for representatives of sugarcane-growing groups.</p>

Tropical and Subtropical AgroecosystemsVol. 28(2)
Universidad Veracruzana (MX), Colegio de Postgraduados (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Plant and soil sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.