Fault or need? The UK’s approach to disability benefits since the Second World War

The UK social security system has never been based on disabled people’s needs. Rather, it has created several subcategories of disability based on medical assessments, insurance status and means testing. While this represents an example of the medical model of disability, the specifics of the system’s evolution since the 1940s are instructive. This article explains those developments in relation to the key national disability benefits, contrasting them with the National Disability Income approach proposed by the Disablement Income Group as early as the 1960s. This helps explain how, why and when disability became an important issue for the major political parties, as well as how the various forerunners of the Department for Work and Pensions attempted to balance political pressures to provide support for disabled people with strong institutional inertia against disrupting the existing system. If the UK decides to institute a Basic Income Plus, this history will provide important context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Discourse
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/20437897y2025d000000069
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fault or need? The UK’s approach to disability benefits since the Second World War

Gareth Millward
Global Discourse
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Fault or need? The UK’s approach to disability benefits since the Second World War

Gareth Millward
article en

Abstract

The UK social security system has never been based on disabled people’s needs. Rather, it has created several subcategories of disability based on medical assessments, insurance status and means testing. While this represents an example of the medical model of disability, the specifics of the system’s evolution since the 1940s are instructive. This article explains those developments in relation to the key national disability benefits, contrasting them with the National Disability Income approach proposed by the Disablement Income Group as early as the 1960s. This helps explain how, why and when disability became an important issue for the major political parties, as well as how the various forerunners of the Department for Work and Pensions attempted to balance political pressures to provide support for disabled people with strong institutional inertia against disrupting the existing system. If the UK decides to institute a Basic Income Plus, this history will provide important context.

Global Discourse
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Wellcome Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.