Seurantatutkimus tyytyväisyydestä suoriutumisen arviointiin suomalaisissa yliopistoissa vuosina 2010–2020

In this study, based on a broad empirical 10-year follow-up dataset, the satisfaction of respondents from three Finnish universities, representing four different disciplines, is examined in relation to the performance evaluations implemented by university administrations. Based on empirical analysis, the study presents two key observations, which the article attempts to further understand in light of theory and extant literature. Firstly, there is clear dissatisfaction among the respondents regarding the performance evaluations carried out by their university administrations. This observation is in line with findings reported in previous literature, which conveys a similarly critical tone regarding performance measurement and management practices in universities. Secondly, the empirical analysis suggests that the aforementioned dissatisfaction appears to diminish at a statistically significant level over the 10-year follow-up period of the study. This finding is significant, as previous research literature has not reported similar results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hallinnon Tutkimus
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37450/ht.143036
Primary Topic
Research in Social Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seurantatutkimus tyytyväisyydestä suoriutumisen arviointiin suomalaisissa yliopistoissa vuosina 2010–2020

Kirsi-Mari Kallio, Tomi J. Kallio, Aki Lehtivuori
Hallinnon Tutkimus
Research in Social Sciences
article

Seurantatutkimus tyytyväisyydestä suoriutumisen arviointiin suomalaisissa yliopistoissa vuosina 2010–2020

Kirsi-Mari Kallio, Tomi J. Kallio, Aki Lehtivuori
article en

Abstract

In this study, based on a broad empirical 10-year follow-up dataset, the satisfaction of respondents from three Finnish universities, representing four different disciplines, is examined in relation to the performance evaluations implemented by university administrations. Based on empirical analysis, the study presents two key observations, which the article attempts to further understand in light of theory and extant literature. Firstly, there is clear dissatisfaction among the respondents regarding the performance evaluations carried out by their university administrations. This observation is in line with findings reported in previous literature, which conveys a similarly critical tone regarding performance measurement and management practices in universities. Secondly, the empirical analysis suggests that the aforementioned dissatisfaction appears to diminish at a statistically significant level over the 10-year follow-up period of the study. This finding is significant, as previous research literature has not reported similar results.

Hallinnon Tutkimus
University of Vaasa (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Research in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.