Understanding digital capabilities and their impacts on Australian agri-food supply chain resilience: Engineering vs. socio-ecological thinking

Many agri-food supply chains (SCs) are vulnerable to sudden disruptions (i.e., shocks), which can have devastating impacts. SC member firms’ digital capabilities (as routinized and integrated resource bundles) have the potential to address these challenges, yet their nature and differentiated impacts on engineering versus socio-ecological resilience are not well understood in the present literature. The purpose of this study is to address these gaps. First, a comprehensive taxonomy of five digital capabilities (labelled LogisticsTech, SecureData, ClientValue, InsightDecision, and InnovateTech) is developed, along with a set of nine resilience criteria/sub-criteria useful for resiliency evaluation. This was achieved through using a narrative literature review, a content analysis, validated by a Delphi study, and semi-structured interviews. Second, the relative impacts of these capabilities on resilience are assessed through pairwise comparison, network analysis, and system dynamics modelling across six Australian agri-food SCs (Grains, Red Meat, Dairy, Horticulture, Seafood, and Wine). The study findings reveal that Australian agri-food SC members’ digital capabilities play distinct but interconnected roles in enhancing resilience, with their impact varying across persistence (engineering), adaptation, and transformation (socio-ecological) over different time frames. LogisticsTech is crucial for short-term, while SecureData safeguards long-term persistence. Moreover, InsightDecision supports immediate adaptation, ClientValue facilitates long-term adaptation, and InnovateTech drives systemic transformation and future-ready SCs. The study offers strategic insights for managers and policymakers to align digital technology adoption with resilience objectives. • A taxonomy of five digital capabilities is developed based on engineering and socio-ecological resilience. • The role of digital capabilities in resilience varies based on short- and long-term needs. • LogisticsTech and SecureData ensure persistence by enabling rapid stabilization and security. • InsightDecision and ClientValue enhance adaptation through agility and market alignment. • InnovateTech drives transformation by fostering systemic reconfiguration and scalability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124191
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding digital capabilities and their impacts on Australian agri-food supply chain resilience: Engineering vs. socio-ecological thinking

Daniel D. Prior, Firouzeh Taghikhah, Petr Matouš, Derek Baker et al.
4 citations
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
8.91
article

Understanding digital capabilities and their impacts on Australian agri-food supply chain resilience: Engineering vs. socio-ecological thinking

Daniel D. Prior, Firouzeh Taghikhah, Petr Matouš, Derek Baker, Reza Hafezi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Many agri-food supply chains (SCs) are vulnerable to sudden disruptions (i.e., shocks), which can have devastating impacts. SC member firms’ digital capabilities (as routinized and integrated resource bundles) have the potential to address these challenges, yet their nature and differentiated impacts on engineering versus socio-ecological resilience are not well understood in the present literature. The purpose of this study is to address these gaps. First, a comprehensive taxonomy of five digital capabilities (labelled LogisticsTech, SecureData, ClientValue, InsightDecision, and InnovateTech) is developed, along with a set of nine resilience criteria/sub-criteria useful for resiliency evaluation. This was achieved through using a narrative literature review, a content analysis, validated by a Delphi study, and semi-structured interviews. Second, the relative impacts of these capabilities on resilience are assessed through pairwise comparison, network analysis, and system dynamics modelling across six Australian agri-food SCs (Grains, Red Meat, Dairy, Horticulture, Seafood, and Wine). The study findings reveal that Australian agri-food SC members’ digital capabilities play distinct but interconnected roles in enhancing resilience, with their impact varying across persistence (engineering), adaptation, and transformation (socio-ecological) over different time frames. LogisticsTech is crucial for short-term, while SecureData safeguards long-term persistence. Moreover, InsightDecision supports immediate adaptation, ClientValue facilitates long-term adaptation, and InnovateTech drives systemic transformation and future-ready SCs. The study offers strategic insights for managers and policymakers to align digital technology adoption with resilience objectives. • A taxonomy of five digital capabilities is developed based on engineering and socio-ecological resilience. • The role of digital capabilities in resilience varies based on short- and long-term needs. • LogisticsTech and SecureData ensure persistence by enabling rapid stabilization and security. • InsightDecision and ClientValue enhance adaptation through agility and market alignment. • InnovateTech drives transformation by fostering systemic reconfiguration and scalability.

Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeVol. 218
The University of Sydney (AU), Iran National Science Foundation (IR), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of New England (AU)
Australian Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.