Rechtsstatelijke cultuur en weerbare rechtsstaat

Constitutional culture and militant constitutionalism Recent years have shown a shift in thinking about the functioning, stability and resilience of the democratic legal order, in terms of both the structural and cultural pre-conditions of its existence. Reports and articles on this topic, however, show three deficits. First, ‘militant democracy’ and ‘militant constitutionalism’ are not clearly distinguished from each other. Second, the concept of militant constitutionalism is often given a very minimalist or ‘narrow’ interpretation: militant constitutionalism as a safeguard only against intentional or deliberately pursued horizontal forms of constitutional regress. A final deficiency concerns the question of the cultural pre-conditions for a stable democratic legal order. What are these cultural pre-conditions, and can a democratic constitutional state guarantee these conditions of existence? These questions have not been clearly answered in recent literature. This article addresses these three deficits in order to contribute to increasing our knowledge about the phenomenon of militant constitutionalism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Beleid en Maatschappij
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/benm/138900692025052002005
Primary Topic
Comparative and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rechtsstatelijke cultuur en weerbare rechtsstaat

Ronald Tinnevelt
Beleid en Maatschappij
Comparative and International Law Studies
article

Rechtsstatelijke cultuur en weerbare rechtsstaat

Ronald Tinnevelt
article en

Abstract

Constitutional culture and militant constitutionalism Recent years have shown a shift in thinking about the functioning, stability and resilience of the democratic legal order, in terms of both the structural and cultural pre-conditions of its existence. Reports and articles on this topic, however, show three deficits. First, ‘militant democracy’ and ‘militant constitutionalism’ are not clearly distinguished from each other. Second, the concept of militant constitutionalism is often given a very minimalist or ‘narrow’ interpretation: militant constitutionalism as a safeguard only against intentional or deliberately pursued horizontal forms of constitutional regress. A final deficiency concerns the question of the cultural pre-conditions for a stable democratic legal order. What are these cultural pre-conditions, and can a democratic constitutional state guarantee these conditions of existence? These questions have not been clearly answered in recent literature. This article addresses these three deficits in order to contribute to increasing our knowledge about the phenomenon of militant constitutionalism.

Beleid en MaatschappijVol. 52(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Comparative and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rechtsstatelijke cultuur en weerbare rechtsstaat — Ronald Tinnevelt · Beleid en Maatschappij (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS