Digital Emotion Detection, Privacy, and the Law

Intuitively, it seems reasonable to prefer that not everyone knows about all our emotions, for example, who we are in love with, who we are angry with, and what we are ashamed of. Moreover, prominent examples in the philosophical discussion of privacy include emotions. Finally, empirical studies show that a significant number of people in the UK and US are uncomfortable with digital emotion detection. In light of this, it may be surprising to learn that current data protection laws in Europe, which are designed to protect privacy, do not specifically address data about emotions. Understanding and discussing this incongruity is the subject of this paper. We will argue for two main claims: first, that anonymous emotion data does not need special legal protection, and second, that there are very good moral reasons to provide non-anonymous emotion data with special legal protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00895-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Emotion Detection, Privacy, and the Law

Eva Weber‐Guskar, Leonhard Menges
1 citations
Philosophy & Technology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.43
article

Digital Emotion Detection, Privacy, and the Law

Eva Weber‐Guskar, Leonhard Menges
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Intuitively, it seems reasonable to prefer that not everyone knows about all our emotions, for example, who we are in love with, who we are angry with, and what we are ashamed of. Moreover, prominent examples in the philosophical discussion of privacy include emotions. Finally, empirical studies show that a significant number of people in the UK and US are uncomfortable with digital emotion detection. In light of this, it may be surprising to learn that current data protection laws in Europe, which are designed to protect privacy, do not specifically address data about emotions. Understanding and discussing this incongruity is the subject of this paper. We will argue for two main claims: first, that anonymous emotion data does not need special legal protection, and second, that there are very good moral reasons to provide non-anonymous emotion data with special legal protection.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 38(2)
University of Salzburg (AT), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Austrian Science Fund, Universität Salzburg, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Emotion Detection, Privacy, and the Law — Eva Weber‐Guskar, Leonhard Menges · Philosophy & Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS