European conservation policy needs a clear definition of ‘wolf-dog hybrid’

Anthropogenic hybridisation, especially when introgressive through backcrossing into parental species, is a global threat to many wild taxa, including wolves ( Canis lupus ) interbreeding with dogs ( C. familiaris or C. l . familiaris ) (i.e., wolf-dog hybridisation, WDH). Despite the Standing Committee of the Bern Convention's recently approved proposal to reduce the protection status of wolves from Appendix II to Appendix III, the assessment of Favourable Conservation Status (FCS) for wolves within the EU Habitats Directive does not consider anthropogenic hybridisation as a separate threat category. Hybrids being increasingly recognised as a relevant threat to European wolves, we advocate that WDH should be considered in assessing their conservation status. However, the lack of a clear and commonly accepted definition of wolf-dog hybrids has been limiting progress on legislation, policy, and conservation management. Therefore, to help mitigate the threat of WDH to wolves, we hereby propose a science-based definition of wolf-dog hybrids as a reference for conservation management. The definition is not intended to prescribe management, which will require case-by-case consideration of various factors including local regulations, conservation priorities, ethics, animal welfare, and human dimensions. It (1) provides an entity for legal and policy efforts, (2) promotes shared and transparent technical standards for hybrid identification, and (3) acknowledges the need for nuanced, population-based management policies. The definition provides an essential first step and an international reference that we envision will help mitigate the threat of WDH to wolves and preserve wolf ecological function. • Anthropogenic hybridisation is a threat to many wild species, including wolves. • The lack of a commonly accepted definition of wolf-dog hybrids impedes progress. • We present a science-based wolf-dog hybrid definition for conservation management. • A clear, common definition will advance legislation, policy, and management. • We propose including hybridisation in Favourable Conservation Status guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111254
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European conservation policy needs a clear definition of ‘wolf-dog hybrid’

Raquel Godinho, Diana Lobo, Massimo Scandura, Mihajla Djan et al.
4 citations
Biological Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
6.87
article

European conservation policy needs a clear definition of ‘wolf-dog hybrid’

Raquel Godinho, Diana Lobo, Massimo Scandura, Mihajla Djan, Marco Galaverni, Tomaž Skrbinšek, Valéria Salvatori, Edoardo Velli, Luca Fumagalli, Carles Vilà, Federica Mattucci, Astrid Vik Strønen, Paolo Ciucci, Robert W. Mysłajek, Romolo Caniglia, Carsten Nowak, Elena Fabbri, Caroline S. Birkenhain
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Anthropogenic hybridisation, especially when introgressive through backcrossing into parental species, is a global threat to many wild taxa, including wolves ( Canis lupus ) interbreeding with dogs ( C. familiaris or C. l . familiaris ) (i.e., wolf-dog hybridisation, WDH). Despite the Standing Committee of the Bern Convention's recently approved proposal to reduce the protection status of wolves from Appendix II to Appendix III, the assessment of Favourable Conservation Status (FCS) for wolves within the EU Habitats Directive does not consider anthropogenic hybridisation as a separate threat category. Hybrids being increasingly recognised as a relevant threat to European wolves, we advocate that WDH should be considered in assessing their conservation status. However, the lack of a clear and commonly accepted definition of wolf-dog hybrids has been limiting progress on legislation, policy, and conservation management. Therefore, to help mitigate the threat of WDH to wolves, we hereby propose a science-based definition of wolf-dog hybrids as a reference for conservation management. The definition is not intended to prescribe management, which will require case-by-case consideration of various factors including local regulations, conservation priorities, ethics, animal welfare, and human dimensions. It (1) provides an entity for legal and policy efforts, (2) promotes shared and transparent technical standards for hybrid identification, and (3) acknowledges the need for nuanced, population-based management policies. The definition provides an essential first step and an international reference that we envision will help mitigate the threat of WDH to wolves and preserve wolf ecological function. • Anthropogenic hybridisation is a threat to many wild species, including wolves. • The lack of a commonly accepted definition of wolf-dog hybrids impedes progress. • We present a science-based wolf-dog hybrid definition for conservation management. • A clear, common definition will advance legislation, policy, and management. • We propose including hybridisation in Favourable Conservation Status guidelines.

Biological ConservationVol. 308
University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Sassari (IT), University of Novi Sad (RS), Universidade do Porto (PT), Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M (DE), Akademia Techniczno-Artystyczna Nauk Stosowanych w Warszawie (PL), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), WWF Italia (IT), Vodovod-Kanalizacija (Slovenia) (SI), Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT), Institut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique (FR), University Centre of Legal Medicine (CH), Istituto di Sessuologia Clinica (IT), University of Warsaw (PL), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Lausanne (CH)
Biodiversa+, European Commission, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Vetenskapsrådet, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.