Analytics of Learner-Centered Feedback: A Large-Scale Case Study in Higher Education

Feedback plays a crucial role in guiding students toward achieving their learning goals. The conceptualization of feedback has shifted from teacher-centered to learner-centered approaches, underscoring the evolving role of educators and students in educational settings. Despite the growing emphasis on learner-centered feedback frameworks, there remains a gap in understanding how these frameworks are implemented in actual teaching practices. This case study addresses this gap by examining the alignment of current feedback practices with learner-centered feedback principles in the Computer Science School at an Australian higher education. We gathered feedback data from the Master of Data Science and Bachelor of Computer Science program that were communicated through the Learning Management System. The dataset included feedback from 4,959 students, provided by approximately 200 instructors across 95 courses. To ensure a representative sample, 10% of feedback entries from each course were analyzed, resulting in 16,408 feedback sentences. The findings reveal a pronounced emphasis on the sensemaking dimension, particularly in evaluating students’ strengths and weaknesses to help them understand their performance. Feedback patterns varied by student performance, with high achievers receiving affirmations, medium achievers receiving actionable suggestions, and low achievers receiving comprehensive evaluations. Feedback in the Master’s program prioritized future impact by offering actionable guidance for advanced tasks, while the Bachelor’s program emphasized fostering agency through active student engagement and participation. • Strong focus on feedback highlighting strengths and weaknesses in both programs. • Master’s program feedback emphasizes guiding students’ future performance. • Bachelor’s program feedback emphasizes fostering student participation and engagement. • Feedback on strengths and weaknesses is typically followed by future guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Education
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105360
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
62.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytics of Learner-Centered Feedback: A Large-Scale Case Study in Higher Education

Dragan Gašević, Michael Henderson, Guanliang Chen, Ahmad Ari Aldino et al.
7 citations
Computers & Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
62.48
article

Analytics of Learner-Centered Feedback: A Large-Scale Case Study in Higher Education

Dragan Gašević, Michael Henderson, Guanliang Chen, Ahmad Ari Aldino, Yi‐Shan Tsai, Debarshi Nath, Siddarth Gupte
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Feedback plays a crucial role in guiding students toward achieving their learning goals. The conceptualization of feedback has shifted from teacher-centered to learner-centered approaches, underscoring the evolving role of educators and students in educational settings. Despite the growing emphasis on learner-centered feedback frameworks, there remains a gap in understanding how these frameworks are implemented in actual teaching practices. This case study addresses this gap by examining the alignment of current feedback practices with learner-centered feedback principles in the Computer Science School at an Australian higher education. We gathered feedback data from the Master of Data Science and Bachelor of Computer Science program that were communicated through the Learning Management System. The dataset included feedback from 4,959 students, provided by approximately 200 instructors across 95 courses. To ensure a representative sample, 10% of feedback entries from each course were analyzed, resulting in 16,408 feedback sentences. The findings reveal a pronounced emphasis on the sensemaking dimension, particularly in evaluating students’ strengths and weaknesses to help them understand their performance. Feedback patterns varied by student performance, with high achievers receiving affirmations, medium achievers receiving actionable suggestions, and low achievers receiving comprehensive evaluations. Feedback in the Master’s program prioritized future impact by offering actionable guidance for advanced tasks, while the Bachelor’s program emphasized fostering agency through active student engagement and participation. • Strong focus on feedback highlighting strengths and weaknesses in both programs. • Master’s program feedback emphasizes guiding students’ future performance. • Bachelor’s program feedback emphasizes fostering student participation and engagement. • Feedback on strengths and weaknesses is typically followed by future guidance.

Computers & EducationVol. 237
IITB-Monash Research Academy (IN), Monash University (AU)
Monash University, Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Student Assessment and Feedback
62.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.