ANALYSIS OF CTT AND IRT ON NON-TEST MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: MATHEMATICAL MINDSET SCALE

Purpose – This study aims to determine empirically the appropriate number of items that meet all item selection criteria, from classical test theory to item response theory.Methodology – This study used the Mathematical Mindset Scale (MMS) as an instrument for a non-test. It was conducted on 259 Mathematics Education students in Indonesia to determine the appropriate number of items that meet all item selection criteria, from classical test theory to item response theory. This quantitative research has been analyzed, including sample adequacy tests, construct validity and reliability, the goodness of fit, model suitability to polytomous data, assumption tests (unidimensional, invariance, local independence), characteristic curve graphs, information function graphs, and standard error graphs.Findings – After several trials, 11 items passed the classical tests and item response theory criteria. It is also known from this study that non-test instruments can be less than 20 as long as they meet the analysis criteria at each stage.Contribution – This research contributes to helping increase insight and knowledge for researchers in the fields of education and psychology, especially those interested in non-test measurement tools and IRT and classical analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL EDUSCIENCE
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v12i3.6542
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYSIS OF CTT AND IRT ON NON-TEST MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: MATHEMATICAL MINDSET SCALE

Meyta Dwi Kurniasih, Priarti Megawanti, Nurimani Nurimani
JURNAL EDUSCIENCE
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

ANALYSIS OF CTT AND IRT ON NON-TEST MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: MATHEMATICAL MINDSET SCALE

Meyta Dwi Kurniasih, Priarti Megawanti, Nurimani Nurimani
article en

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to determine empirically the appropriate number of items that meet all item selection criteria, from classical test theory to item response theory.Methodology – This study used the Mathematical Mindset Scale (MMS) as an instrument for a non-test. It was conducted on 259 Mathematics Education students in Indonesia to determine the appropriate number of items that meet all item selection criteria, from classical test theory to item response theory. This quantitative research has been analyzed, including sample adequacy tests, construct validity and reliability, the goodness of fit, model suitability to polytomous data, assumption tests (unidimensional, invariance, local independence), characteristic curve graphs, information function graphs, and standard error graphs.Findings – After several trials, 11 items passed the classical tests and item response theory criteria. It is also known from this study that non-test instruments can be less than 20 as long as they meet the analysis criteria at each stage.Contribution – This research contributes to helping increase insight and knowledge for researchers in the fields of education and psychology, especially those interested in non-test measurement tools and IRT and classical analysis.

JURNAL EDUSCIENCEVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.