MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY OF STUDENTS IN TERMS OF ADVERSITY QUOTIENT AND SELF-EFFICACY

Purpose – This study aims to analyze students' mathematical problem-solvingproblem-solving skills in SPLDV material in terms of adversity quotient and self-efficacy and provide recommendations for improving students' mathematical problem-solvingproblem-solving skills in schools with comparable backgrounds.Methodology – The research approach used is a qualitative approach with a case study method. The subjects of this study were three ninth-grade students selected based on the students' AQ and SE levels. The data collection technique used was triangulation. The test instrument for this study was a problem-solving ability test. The non-test instruments for this study were the AQ Questionnaire, SE Questionnaire, and interview guidelines. The techniques for examining data validity in qualitative research include testing credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability.Findings – The study found that students with a climber adversity quotient and high self-efficacy excel in mathematical problem-solving, fulfilling all four problem-solving indicators: understanding the problem, planning a strategy, implementing a solution, and re-examining the results. Students with a camper adversity quotient and high self-efficacy have good problem-solving skills but are not optimal, fulfilling three indicators. Students with a quitter adversity quotient and low self-efficacy tend to struggle, fulfilling only two indicators and often giving up. Contribution – The results of this study are expected to contribute to mathematics education by serving as a reference for research on students' mathematical problem-solving abilities about adversity quotient and self-efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL EDUSCIENCE
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v12i3.7164
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY OF STUDENTS IN TERMS OF ADVERSITY QUOTIENT AND SELF-EFFICACY

Suhendra Suhendra, Suci Charolina
JURNAL EDUSCIENCE
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY OF STUDENTS IN TERMS OF ADVERSITY QUOTIENT AND SELF-EFFICACY

Suhendra Suhendra, Suci Charolina
article en

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to analyze students' mathematical problem-solvingproblem-solving skills in SPLDV material in terms of adversity quotient and self-efficacy and provide recommendations for improving students' mathematical problem-solvingproblem-solving skills in schools with comparable backgrounds.Methodology – The research approach used is a qualitative approach with a case study method. The subjects of this study were three ninth-grade students selected based on the students' AQ and SE levels. The data collection technique used was triangulation. The test instrument for this study was a problem-solving ability test. The non-test instruments for this study were the AQ Questionnaire, SE Questionnaire, and interview guidelines. The techniques for examining data validity in qualitative research include testing credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability.Findings – The study found that students with a climber adversity quotient and high self-efficacy excel in mathematical problem-solving, fulfilling all four problem-solving indicators: understanding the problem, planning a strategy, implementing a solution, and re-examining the results. Students with a camper adversity quotient and high self-efficacy have good problem-solving skills but are not optimal, fulfilling three indicators. Students with a quitter adversity quotient and low self-efficacy tend to struggle, fulfilling only two indicators and often giving up. Contribution – The results of this study are expected to contribute to mathematics education by serving as a reference for research on students' mathematical problem-solving abilities about adversity quotient and self-efficacy.

JURNAL EDUSCIENCEVol. 12(3)
Indonesia University of Education (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.