Beyond Benchmarks: Evaluating Generalist Medical Artificial Intelligence With Psychometrics

Rigorous evaluation of generalist medical artificial intelligence (GMAI) is imperative to ensure their utility and safety before implementation in health care. Current evaluation strategies rely heavily on benchmarks, which can suffer from issues with data contamination and cannot explain how GMAI might fail (lacking explanatory power) or in what circumstances (lacking predictive power). To address these limitations, we propose a new methodology to improve the quality of GMAI evaluation using construct-oriented processes. Drawing on modern psychometric techniques, we introduce approaches to construct identification and present alternative assessment formats for different domains of professional skills, knowledge, and behaviors that are essential for safe practice. We also discuss the need for human oversight in future GMAI adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/70901
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Benchmarks: Evaluating Generalist Medical Artificial Intelligence With Psychometrics

David Stillwell, Liming Jiang, José Hernández‐Orallo, Luning Sun et al.
1 links
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Beyond Benchmarks: Evaluating Generalist Medical Artificial Intelligence With Psychometrics

David Stillwell, Liming Jiang, José Hernández‐Orallo, Luning Sun, Xing Xie, Xiting Wang, Fang Luo
article en

Abstract

Rigorous evaluation of generalist medical artificial intelligence (GMAI) is imperative to ensure their utility and safety before implementation in health care. Current evaluation strategies rely heavily on benchmarks, which can suffer from issues with data contamination and cannot explain how GMAI might fail (lacking explanatory power) or in what circumstances (lacking predictive power). To address these limitations, we propose a new methodology to improve the quality of GMAI evaluation using construct-oriented processes. Drawing on modern psychometric techniques, we introduce approaches to construct identification and present alternative assessment formats for different domains of professional skills, knowledge, and behaviors that are essential for safe practice. We also discuss the need for human oversight in future GMAI adoption.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
Oracle (United States) (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Beijing Normal University (CN), Valencian International University (ES), Cambridge School (PT), Bridge University (SS), Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN), Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (ES), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES), Renmin University of China (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.