Health and well-being in cohabitation versus marriage: Are cohabitants’ marriage intentions important?

We investigated the similarities and differences in health and well-being for individuals in cohabiting relationships compared to marriage, enriching the extant literature by differentiating cohabitants with the intention to marry from those with no intention to marry. We used 18 waves of panel data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey (n = 2820) and fixed-effects models to examine within-individual differences in general health, mental health, and life satisfaction across different relationship states and transitions among men and women. Differentiating outcomes when respondents are cohabitants with and without intention to marry was important, and our results suggested notable health differences when respondents were cohabiting but likely to marry, cohabiting but not likely to marry, and married. We did not find consistently that being married was associated with the best overall health and well-being. The findings contribute to a growing body of research suggesting that the health and well-being benefits of marriage are also evident when people are cohabiting. • Married people did not necessarily have better health and wellbeing than cohabitors. • Cohabitors likely to marry their partner had better health and wellbeing than those not likely to marry. • Single people in general had poorer healthand wellbeing than people in cohabiting or marital relationships. • Men who married had better general health than women who married. • Women who were cohabiting likely to marry their partner had better mental health than when they married.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101488
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health and well-being in cohabitation versus marriage: Are cohabitants’ marriage intentions important?

Sergi Vidal, Belinda Hewitt
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

Health and well-being in cohabitation versus marriage: Are cohabitants’ marriage intentions important?

Sergi Vidal, Belinda Hewitt
article en

Abstract

We investigated the similarities and differences in health and well-being for individuals in cohabiting relationships compared to marriage, enriching the extant literature by differentiating cohabitants with the intention to marry from those with no intention to marry. We used 18 waves of panel data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey (n = 2820) and fixed-effects models to examine within-individual differences in general health, mental health, and life satisfaction across different relationship states and transitions among men and women. Differentiating outcomes when respondents are cohabitants with and without intention to marry was important, and our results suggested notable health differences when respondents were cohabiting but likely to marry, cohabiting but not likely to marry, and married. We did not find consistently that being married was associated with the best overall health and well-being. The findings contribute to a growing body of research suggesting that the health and well-being benefits of marriage are also evident when people are cohabiting. • Married people did not necessarily have better health and wellbeing than cohabitors. • Cohabitors likely to marry their partner had better health and wellbeing than those not likely to marry. • Single people in general had poorer healthand wellbeing than people in cohabiting or marital relationships. • Men who married had better general health than women who married. • Women who were cohabiting likely to marry their partner had better mental health than when they married.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 11
The University of Melbourne (AU), Centre for Demographic Studies (ES)
Australian Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.