Art and embodied knowledge: the bodily basis of aesthetic cognitivism

ABSTRACT This article seeks to further the dialogue between aesthetic cognitivism and embodied cognition, two influential paradigms in the study of aesthetics. I first provide a discussion of the different ways the sense-perceptual has been theorized in relation to aesthetic cognitivism. Adopting Elisabeth Schellekens’s recent classification of how we may learn from art or aesthetic engagement, I distinguish between four models: the standard model, the autonomy model, the enabler model, and Schellekens’s own noetic model. Second, I draw on Mark Johnson’s Deweyan-inspired approach to aesthetics to develop an embodied conception of aesthetic cognitivism that is much in favor of the noetic model, but that also stresses the significant role of the body and sensory experience in shaping the intellectual value of art. Third and last, Rudolf Arnheim’s work on visual dynamics in fixed images and my own work on image schemas in film will serve as case studies to illustrate the cognitive benefits of these patterns in art, particularly for perceptual learning, supporting Ted Nannicelli’s recent perceptual-cognitive model of aesthetic education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpaf025
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Art and embodied knowledge: the bodily basis of aesthetic cognitivism

Maarten Coëgnarts
4 citations
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
5.72
article

Art and embodied knowledge: the bodily basis of aesthetic cognitivism

Maarten Coëgnarts
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article seeks to further the dialogue between aesthetic cognitivism and embodied cognition, two influential paradigms in the study of aesthetics. I first provide a discussion of the different ways the sense-perceptual has been theorized in relation to aesthetic cognitivism. Adopting Elisabeth Schellekens’s recent classification of how we may learn from art or aesthetic engagement, I distinguish between four models: the standard model, the autonomy model, the enabler model, and Schellekens’s own noetic model. Second, I draw on Mark Johnson’s Deweyan-inspired approach to aesthetics to develop an embodied conception of aesthetic cognitivism that is much in favor of the noetic model, but that also stresses the significant role of the body and sensory experience in shaping the intellectual value of art. Third and last, Rudolf Arnheim’s work on visual dynamics in fixed images and my own work on image schemas in film will serve as case studies to illustrate the cognitive benefits of these patterns in art, particularly for perceptual learning, supporting Ted Nannicelli’s recent perceptual-cognitive model of aesthetic education.

Journal of Aesthetics and Art CriticismVol. 83(3)
University of Antwerp (BE), University of the Free State (ZA), LUCA School of Arts (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.