Realistic Mathematics Education: Investigating the Argumentation Dialogue in Problem-Solving Activity

This study delves into how contextualized learning, a key element of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, shapes how Grade 9 students develop their problem-solving skills. Set in a laboratory school within a Philippine state university, the research captured fundamental classroom dynamics through observations, interviews, and content analysis. By anchoring lessons in relatable, real-life problems and guiding students through thoughtful questioning, the study found that learners became more engaged, reflective, and confident in approaching mathematical tasks. Using argumentation, dialogues revealed how students gradually transitioned from everyday reasoning to more formal mathematical thinking. Insights from learners and pre-service teachers underscored the value of this approach in making mathematics more meaningful and the practical challenges of its classroom implementation. Ultimately, the study highlights the promise of RME in fostering a richer, more connected learning experience.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90400522
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Realistic Mathematics Education: Investigating the Argumentation Dialogue in Problem-Solving Activity

Joy R. Magsayo, Joan Rose T. Luib, Oscar O. Romero, Gilbert B. Cagaanan
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Realistic Mathematics Education: Investigating the Argumentation Dialogue in Problem-Solving Activity

Joy R. Magsayo, Joan Rose T. Luib, Oscar O. Romero, Gilbert B. Cagaanan
article en

Abstract

This study delves into how contextualized learning, a key element of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach, shapes how Grade 9 students develop their problem-solving skills. Set in a laboratory school within a Philippine state university, the research captured fundamental classroom dynamics through observations, interviews, and content analysis. By anchoring lessons in relatable, real-life problems and guiding students through thoughtful questioning, the study found that learners became more engaged, reflective, and confident in approaching mathematical tasks. Using argumentation, dialogues revealed how students gradually transitioned from everyday reasoning to more formal mathematical thinking. Insights from learners and pre-service teachers underscored the value of this approach in making mathematics more meaningful and the practical challenges of its classroom implementation. Ultimately, the study highlights the promise of RME in fostering a richer, more connected learning experience.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceVol. IX(IV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Realistic Mathematics Education: Investigating the Argumentation Dialogue in Problem-Solving Activity — Joy R. Magsayo, Joan Rose T. Luib, et al. · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS