Could the gasification of Solid Recovered Fuel compete with its incineration? Answer by techno-economic and environmental analysis for the French case

Several valorisation pathways for Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) utilising gasification to produce various outputs (heat, electricity and Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG)) were compared to the benchmark incineration. Energy yields varied notably among the scenarios: 66 % for incineration, 44 % for gasification followed by syngas combustion in a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine, and 54–62 % for SNG production (using Water Gas Shift or alkaline electrolysis to adjust the H 2 /CO ratio, respectively). Carbon assessments revealed that SNG production from SRF is only beneficial if the displaced electricity and heat due to SRF diversion are replaced by low-carbon sources (<70 kgCO 2eq /MWh e/th ). Applying the European delegated regulation 2023/1184, SNG-producing scenarios exhibited carbon intensities of 119 and 98 kgCO 2eq /MWh LHV , which exceeds the renewable threshold at 71 kgCO 2eq /MWh LHV . The economic analysis showed that the incineration remains the least risky option from an economic standpoint due to lower capital costs and reduced sensitivity to uncertainties. The Gasification → SNG appears competitive for SNG retail prices beyond 60 € 2023 /MWh HHV . The Gasification + AEL → SNG is the most profitable although the riskiest scenario, as its performance is only attainable with electricity prices below 100 € 2023 /MWh e and SNG retail prices above 100 € 2023 /MWh HHV . Amid the urgent need to reduce landfilling, these findings guide SRF valorisation strategies by balancing efficiency, carbon emissions mitigation and economic viability. • Solid Recovered fuels is a significant feedstock that can be valorised via gasification. • Several scenarios based on SRF gasification are compared to benchmark incineration. • SNG from SRF gasification is competitive if retail price of gas is beyond 60 € 2023 /MWh HHV . • The carbon intensity of the produced SNG highly depends on local energy networks. • SNG from SRF is relevant to decarbonize if heat and electricity networks are low carbon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass and Bioenergy
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Could the gasification of Solid Recovered Fuel compete with its incineration? Answer by techno-economic and environmental analysis for the French case

Julie Cren, P. Maitre, Luc Bertier, G. Haarlemmer et al.
1 citations
Biomass and Bioenergy
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.67
article

Could the gasification of Solid Recovered Fuel compete with its incineration? Answer by techno-economic and environmental analysis for the French case

Julie Cren, P. Maitre, Luc Bertier, G. Haarlemmer, Frédéric Ducros
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Several valorisation pathways for Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) utilising gasification to produce various outputs (heat, electricity and Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG)) were compared to the benchmark incineration. Energy yields varied notably among the scenarios: 66 % for incineration, 44 % for gasification followed by syngas combustion in a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine, and 54–62 % for SNG production (using Water Gas Shift or alkaline electrolysis to adjust the H 2 /CO ratio, respectively). Carbon assessments revealed that SNG production from SRF is only beneficial if the displaced electricity and heat due to SRF diversion are replaced by low-carbon sources (<70 kgCO 2eq /MWh e/th ). Applying the European delegated regulation 2023/1184, SNG-producing scenarios exhibited carbon intensities of 119 and 98 kgCO 2eq /MWh LHV , which exceeds the renewable threshold at 71 kgCO 2eq /MWh LHV . The economic analysis showed that the incineration remains the least risky option from an economic standpoint due to lower capital costs and reduced sensitivity to uncertainties. The Gasification → SNG appears competitive for SNG retail prices beyond 60 € 2023 /MWh HHV . The Gasification + AEL → SNG is the most profitable although the riskiest scenario, as its performance is only attainable with electricity prices below 100 € 2023 /MWh e and SNG retail prices above 100 € 2023 /MWh HHV . Amid the urgent need to reduce landfilling, these findings guide SRF valorisation strategies by balancing efficiency, carbon emissions mitigation and economic viability. • Solid Recovered fuels is a significant feedstock that can be valorised via gasification. • Several scenarios based on SRF gasification are compared to benchmark incineration. • SNG from SRF gasification is competitive if retail price of gas is beyond 60 € 2023 /MWh HHV . • The carbon intensity of the produced SNG highly depends on local energy networks. • SNG from SRF is relevant to decarbonize if heat and electricity networks are low carbon.

Biomass and BioenergyVol. 200
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Laboratoire d’Innovation pour les Technologies des Énergies Nouvelles et les nanomatériaux (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.