A comparative archaeometric study of Late Bronze Age Black Lustrous and Red Lustrous Wheel-made wares from the Eastern Mediterranean

• Comprehensive archaeometric study of Late Bronze Age Black Lustrous Wheel-made Ware (BLW) from the Eastern Mediterranean. • BLW ceramic from the Eastern Mediterranean and clays from N-Cyprus analyzed using archaeometric methods. • Analyses identify eastern Cyprus as the most likely provenance of BLW, • Black Lustrous and Red Lustrous Wheel-made Ware represent distinct production traditions. Black Lustrous Wheel-made Ware (BLW) and Red Lustrous Wheel-made Ware (RLW) are two distinctive fine ceramic types that circulated across the Eastern Mediterranean during the Late Bronze Age (c. 1650–1050 BCE). While RLW has been extensively studied and its production linked to Rough Cilicia (Southern Anatolia), the provenance, manufacturing, and distribution of BLW remain poorly understood. BLW appears in small quantities at sites across Cyprus, the Levant, Egypt, and Southern Anatolia, yet its relationship to RLW has not been systematically examined through archaeometric analysis. This study presents the results of an archaeometric investigation of 45 BLW samples from Alalakh (Türkiye), Enkomi (Cyprus), Ashkelon (Israel), and Aniba (Egypt) to address questions regarding raw material sources, production, and possible connections between BLW and RLW in terms of provenance and technological traditions. To achieve this, a multi-analytical approach was employed, integrating laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and strontium-neodymium (Sr-Nd) isotope analysis for elemental and isotopic characterization for provenance determination, and petrographic thin-section analysis for fabric characterization. Additionally, 22 reference clay samples from the northern Cyprus were analyzed to assess potential raw material sources for BLW. The analytical results demonstrate that BLW was produced using multiple clay sources available in northern/northeastern Cyprus, supporting the archaeological hypothesis of a Cypriot origin. Compositional data further indicate that BLW and RLW represent distinct manufacturing traditions, with RLW linked to Southern Anatolia, while BLW belongs to the Cypriot Late Bronze Age ceramic tradition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105216
Primary Topic
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative archaeometric study of Late Bronze Age Black Lustrous and Red Lustrous Wheel-made wares from the Eastern Mediterranean

Celia J. Bergoffen, Lindy Crewe, Ekin Kozal, Patrick Monien et al.
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
article

A comparative archaeometric study of Late Bronze Age Black Lustrous and Red Lustrous Wheel-made wares from the Eastern Mediterranean

Celia J. Bergoffen, Lindy Crewe, Ekin Kozal, Patrick Monien, Mario A. S. Martin, Irmgard Hein, Mustafa Kibaroğlu
article en

Abstract

• Comprehensive archaeometric study of Late Bronze Age Black Lustrous Wheel-made Ware (BLW) from the Eastern Mediterranean. • BLW ceramic from the Eastern Mediterranean and clays from N-Cyprus analyzed using archaeometric methods. • Analyses identify eastern Cyprus as the most likely provenance of BLW, • Black Lustrous and Red Lustrous Wheel-made Ware represent distinct production traditions. Black Lustrous Wheel-made Ware (BLW) and Red Lustrous Wheel-made Ware (RLW) are two distinctive fine ceramic types that circulated across the Eastern Mediterranean during the Late Bronze Age (c. 1650–1050 BCE). While RLW has been extensively studied and its production linked to Rough Cilicia (Southern Anatolia), the provenance, manufacturing, and distribution of BLW remain poorly understood. BLW appears in small quantities at sites across Cyprus, the Levant, Egypt, and Southern Anatolia, yet its relationship to RLW has not been systematically examined through archaeometric analysis. This study presents the results of an archaeometric investigation of 45 BLW samples from Alalakh (Türkiye), Enkomi (Cyprus), Ashkelon (Israel), and Aniba (Egypt) to address questions regarding raw material sources, production, and possible connections between BLW and RLW in terms of provenance and technological traditions. To achieve this, a multi-analytical approach was employed, integrating laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and strontium-neodymium (Sr-Nd) isotope analysis for elemental and isotopic characterization for provenance determination, and petrographic thin-section analysis for fabric characterization. Additionally, 22 reference clay samples from the northern Cyprus were analyzed to assess potential raw material sources for BLW. The analytical results demonstrate that BLW was produced using multiple clay sources available in northern/northeastern Cyprus, supporting the archaeological hypothesis of a Cypriot origin. Compositional data further indicate that BLW and RLW represent distinct manufacturing traditions, with RLW linked to Southern Anatolia, while BLW belongs to the Cypriot Late Bronze Age ceramic tradition.

Journal of Archaeological Science ReportsVol. 65
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), University of Bremen (DE), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology (AT), University of Tübingen (DE), Fashion Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.