The role of institutional pressures in greenwashing: a two-phase study on company behavior

Purpose The study has analyzed the impact of economic, coercive, normative and mimetic institutional pressures on corporate greenwashing within various industries and time frames. It has also studied the moderating effect of consumer skepticism in the context of greenwashing practices in order to understand how actual sustainability initiatives can be achieved. Design/methodology/approach This study used a longitudinal research design and covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) analysis of survey responses regarding greenwashing practices during two periods (February–May 2023 and March–June 2024). The respondents of the online surveys were 1,756 managers in Indian corporations. The response rate was 504 in Phase 1 and 452 in Phase 2. Thus, institutional pressures and consumer skepticism were measured longitudinally. Findings According to our study, many pressures, such as economic, coercive, normative and mimetic, contribute a lot to driving greenwashing practices. Furthermore, the impacts of green skepticism may vary depending on the context. In particular, while in both periods of studies, its influence on the mimetic pressures-greenwashing relationship remains, it diverges concerning economic and normative pressure. Coercive pressures significantly affect greenwashing regardless of whether there is any presence of skepticism, among other things. Practical implications These results reveal intricate connections between regulatory and societal norms encouraging compliance with minimal environmental standards. The findings from this study suggest that increased transparency and consumer scrutiny can help to reduce greenwashing practices and promote genuine sustainability. Originality/value Our research mainly examines how different pressures are related to a low level of trust toward environmental initiatives and impact corporate environmental claims collectively. Therefore, conducting more extensive studies covering several industries and geographical locations is essential. There is also a need to understand further the role digital platforms and cultural contexts play in influencing the occurrence of greenwashing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bank Marketing
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-08-2024-0485
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of institutional pressures in greenwashing: a two-phase study on company behavior

Ciro Troise, Stefano Bresciani, Debarun Chakraborty
4 citations
International Journal of Bank Marketing
Environmental Sustainability in Business
8.29
article

The role of institutional pressures in greenwashing: a two-phase study on company behavior

Ciro Troise, Stefano Bresciani, Debarun Chakraborty
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Purpose The study has analyzed the impact of economic, coercive, normative and mimetic institutional pressures on corporate greenwashing within various industries and time frames. It has also studied the moderating effect of consumer skepticism in the context of greenwashing practices in order to understand how actual sustainability initiatives can be achieved. Design/methodology/approach This study used a longitudinal research design and covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) analysis of survey responses regarding greenwashing practices during two periods (February–May 2023 and March–June 2024). The respondents of the online surveys were 1,756 managers in Indian corporations. The response rate was 504 in Phase 1 and 452 in Phase 2. Thus, institutional pressures and consumer skepticism were measured longitudinally. Findings According to our study, many pressures, such as economic, coercive, normative and mimetic, contribute a lot to driving greenwashing practices. Furthermore, the impacts of green skepticism may vary depending on the context. In particular, while in both periods of studies, its influence on the mimetic pressures-greenwashing relationship remains, it diverges concerning economic and normative pressure. Coercive pressures significantly affect greenwashing regardless of whether there is any presence of skepticism, among other things. Practical implications These results reveal intricate connections between regulatory and societal norms encouraging compliance with minimal environmental standards. The findings from this study suggest that increased transparency and consumer scrutiny can help to reduce greenwashing practices and promote genuine sustainability. Originality/value Our research mainly examines how different pressures are related to a low level of trust toward environmental initiatives and impact corporate environmental claims collectively. Therefore, conducting more extensive studies covering several industries and geographical locations is essential. There is also a need to understand further the role digital platforms and cultural contexts play in influencing the occurrence of greenwashing.

International Journal of Bank Marketing
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.