Characterizations of two basic hybrid logics

Abstract We prove a van Benthem–Rosen-style characterization theorem for two basic hybrid logics: modal logic with nominals, and modal logic with nominals and @. In each case, we show that over all Kripke models, and over all finite Kripke models, every first-order formula that is invariant under the appropriate bisimulations is equivalent to a hybrid formula, and we give optimal bounds on its modal depth in terms of the quantifier depth of the first-order formula. We also show that the characterization for modal logic with nominals and @ extends to arbitrary bisimulation-closed classes of Kripke models and to the class of finite models within such classes, while the characterization for modal logic with nominals alone does not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Logic and Computation
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exaf025
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizations of two basic hybrid logics

Ian Hodkinson
Journal of Logic and Computation
Formal Methods in Verification
article

Characterizations of two basic hybrid logics

Ian Hodkinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract We prove a van Benthem–Rosen-style characterization theorem for two basic hybrid logics: modal logic with nominals, and modal logic with nominals and @. In each case, we show that over all Kripke models, and over all finite Kripke models, every first-order formula that is invariant under the appropriate bisimulations is equivalent to a hybrid formula, and we give optimal bounds on its modal depth in terms of the quantifier depth of the first-order formula. We also show that the characterization for modal logic with nominals and @ extends to arbitrary bisimulation-closed classes of Kripke models and to the class of finite models within such classes, while the characterization for modal logic with nominals alone does not.

Journal of Logic and ComputationVol. 35(4)
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.