The Impact of Learning Approach and Study Habits on Student Performance in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course

Developing effective teaching strategies relies on understanding factors that contribute to student learning. Two areas that are commonly considered in this context are study habits and student learning approaches. While study habits can encompass a wide range of behaviors, learning approach is often viewed on two scales: deep and surface. Although learning approach and study habits are interrelated, they are often looked at in isolation and their impact on student learning is not fully understood. With this in mind, we investigated the relationship between learning approach, study habits, and examination performance in a baccalaureate-level human anatomy course. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire was used to determine student learning approach preferences. In addition, an in-house survey was designed to collect data related to the amount of time and distribution effort students used in preparation for examinations. Results indicate that students with a comparatively stronger reliance on a deep approach typically spent more time studying, but other study-related behaviors, such as how study time was distributed, were not consistently correlated with learning approach and learning approach itself was not a strong predictor of examination performance. The most notable finding related to examination performance was that students who increased the amount of time devoted to studying improved significantly, regardless of their learning approach. Overall, these findings highlight the complex nature of student learning and underscore the need to continue refining how learning approach is measured.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Educator
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02424-6
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Learning Approach and Study Habits on Student Performance in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course

Andrew R. Thompson, Amulya Vankayalapati, Neal Taliwal
Medical Science Educator
Innovations in Medical Education
article

The Impact of Learning Approach and Study Habits on Student Performance in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course

Andrew R. Thompson, Amulya Vankayalapati, Neal Taliwal
article en

Abstract

Developing effective teaching strategies relies on understanding factors that contribute to student learning. Two areas that are commonly considered in this context are study habits and student learning approaches. While study habits can encompass a wide range of behaviors, learning approach is often viewed on two scales: deep and surface. Although learning approach and study habits are interrelated, they are often looked at in isolation and their impact on student learning is not fully understood. With this in mind, we investigated the relationship between learning approach, study habits, and examination performance in a baccalaureate-level human anatomy course. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire was used to determine student learning approach preferences. In addition, an in-house survey was designed to collect data related to the amount of time and distribution effort students used in preparation for examinations. Results indicate that students with a comparatively stronger reliance on a deep approach typically spent more time studying, but other study-related behaviors, such as how study time was distributed, were not consistently correlated with learning approach and learning approach itself was not a strong predictor of examination performance. The most notable finding related to examination performance was that students who increased the amount of time devoted to studying improved significantly, regardless of their learning approach. Overall, these findings highlight the complex nature of student learning and underscore the need to continue refining how learning approach is measured.

Medical Science EducatorVol. 35(4)
Sabin Vaccine Institute (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.