Experimental investigation and constitutive modelling of the mechanical and ratcheting properties in rail steels

Abstract The ratcheting phenomenon remains a persistent concern in modern railways due to its close association with head checks, a typical type of rolling contact fatigue. This study presents experimental research focussing on elucidating the mechanical, hardening, and material ratcheting properties of one bainitic (B320) and two pearlitic (R220 and R260MN) rail steels. The experiment consisted of monotonic tension, uniaxial cyclic strain range, and uniaxial cyclic stress range tests. Two load cases representing the equivalent stresses experienced by rails under real-life wheel–rail contacts were used in the cyclic stress range tests to assess the rail ratcheting behaviour in railway operating conditions. The test results highlighted that the two pearlitic steels showed similar mechanical strength and ratcheting behaviour; and by contrast, the bainitic steel exhibited superior mechanical strengths and yielded significantly weaker ratcheting responses for both load cases. The study then characterised the three rail steels by calibrating for them the hardening parameters of two classical constitutive models: Chaboche and Ohno-Wang II (OWII) based on the monotonic and cyclic strain range tests. The hardening parameters of the constitutive models were then optimied based on the cyclic stress range tests to represent the material ratcheting behaviours of rail steels for each load case. Notably, the OWII model demonstrated higher precision in reproducing ratcheting strains and rates than the Chaboche model, which faced limitations in simulating relatively low ratcheting rates. This study enhanced the understanding of the mechanical and ratcheting properties of the investigated rail steels and provided insights into the applicability of constitutive models for predicting and mitigating rail ratcheting effects.