A Comparative Study between Traditional Wound Closure and Subcutaneous Negative Pressure Drain Closure for Midline Incision in Emergency Laparotomy to Prevent Surgical Site Infection

Background: Surgical site infection is the most common postoperative complication after emergency laparotomy which associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased cost of treatment etc. Even after sensitivity based antibiotic use and judicious irrigation of wound with saline, it remains a major concern. Materials and Methods: This Quasi Experimental study was conducted among 104 patients from January 2022 to June 2023. The patients were divided equally into two groups: Group-I (closure over subcutaneous negative pressure drain) and Group-II (traditional wound closure). Finally, wound complications and hospital stay were recorded. The test statistics to be used are descriptive statistics, Chi-square (2) and student’s t-Test. P-value 0.05 considered as a statistically significant. Results: The demographics parameters indicated no significant differences in age and gender distribution. Surgical site Infection showed significant reduction in Group-I than Group-II (9.6% vs 32.7%, p=0.004). Similarly, the incidence of wound dehiscence was also lower in Group-I than Group-II (1.9% vs 11.5%, p=0.050) which was statistically significant. Burst abdomen and seroma also lower in Group-I (p=0.153). Furthermore, duration of hospital stays and readmission for SSI was significantly shorter in Group-I compared to Group-II (5.44±1.88 days vs 7.62 ± 3.95 days, p=0.001 and 1.9% vs 13.5%, p=0.027). Conclusion: The utilization of subcutaneous negative pressure drain closure showed statistically significant advantages over traditional wound closure in terms of preventing surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, length of hospital stays and readmission rate for surgical site related complications. The incidence of burst abdomen was also fewer among negative pressure drain group but not statistically significant Therefore, subcutaneous negative pressure drain closure had potential benefit in reducing surgical site related complications following emergency laparotomy with peritonitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Medicine and Health
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajmah/2025/v23i61244
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study between Traditional Wound Closure and Subcutaneous Negative Pressure Drain Closure for Midline Incision in Emergency Laparotomy to Prevent Surgical Site Infection

Nabarun Biswas, Md. Abul Kalam Azad, Mst. Anjuman Ara, Fahim Foysal Kollol et al.
1 links
Asian Journal of Medicine and Health
Surgical site infection prevention
article

A Comparative Study between Traditional Wound Closure and Subcutaneous Negative Pressure Drain Closure for Midline Incision in Emergency Laparotomy to Prevent Surgical Site Infection

Nabarun Biswas, Md. Abul Kalam Azad, Mst. Anjuman Ara, Fahim Foysal Kollol, Md. Touhidul Islam, A.M. Forid Uddin Ahmed, E Reza, Mahedi Afroz Shakil, Sharmin Akter Rime, Tamanna Rahman Shanta
article en

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection is the most common postoperative complication after emergency laparotomy which associated with prolonged hospital stay, increased cost of treatment etc. Even after sensitivity based antibiotic use and judicious irrigation of wound with saline, it remains a major concern. Materials and Methods: This Quasi Experimental study was conducted among 104 patients from January 2022 to June 2023. The patients were divided equally into two groups: Group-I (closure over subcutaneous negative pressure drain) and Group-II (traditional wound closure). Finally, wound complications and hospital stay were recorded. The test statistics to be used are descriptive statistics, Chi-square (2) and student’s t-Test. P-value 0.05 considered as a statistically significant. Results: The demographics parameters indicated no significant differences in age and gender distribution. Surgical site Infection showed significant reduction in Group-I than Group-II (9.6% vs 32.7%, p=0.004). Similarly, the incidence of wound dehiscence was also lower in Group-I than Group-II (1.9% vs 11.5%, p=0.050) which was statistically significant. Burst abdomen and seroma also lower in Group-I (p=0.153). Furthermore, duration of hospital stays and readmission for SSI was significantly shorter in Group-I compared to Group-II (5.44±1.88 days vs 7.62 ± 3.95 days, p=0.001 and 1.9% vs 13.5%, p=0.027). Conclusion: The utilization of subcutaneous negative pressure drain closure showed statistically significant advantages over traditional wound closure in terms of preventing surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, length of hospital stays and readmission rate for surgical site related complications. The incidence of burst abdomen was also fewer among negative pressure drain group but not statistically significant Therefore, subcutaneous negative pressure drain closure had potential benefit in reducing surgical site related complications following emergency laparotomy with peritonitis.

Asian Journal of Medicine and HealthVol. 23(6)
Rajshahi Medical College (BD), Dinajpur Medical College (BD), Patuakhali Science and Technology University (BD), Mymensingh Medical College Hospital (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.