The Relationship Between Stress Levels and Carbohydrate Intake with The Nutritional Status of Students of SMPN 22 Surakarta

Multifactorial elements, including psychological and dietary factors such as stress levels and carbohydrate intake, influence adolescent nutritional status. This study analyzed the relationship between stress and carbohydrate intake with the nutritional status of 9th-grade students at SMPN 22 Surakarta. Using a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 141 randomly selected students. Stress levels were measured using the DASS-21 questionnaire, carbohydrate intake was assessed through a 24-hour recall over three non-consecutive days, and nutritional status was evaluated via BMI-for-age (BMI/U) z-scores. Results indicated that students with poor nutritional status exhibited higher severe stress (28.6%) and lower carbohydrate intake (10.8%). Conversely, students with better nutritional status reported moderate stress (22.7%) and higher carbohydrate intake (25%). However, bivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant relationship between stress levels and nutritional status (p=0.714), nor between carbohydrate intake and nutritional status (p=0.676). These findings suggest that stress and carbohydrate intake alone are insufficient predictors of adolescent nutritional status. Further research should investigate other influencing factors such as physical activity, overall dietary patterns, sleep quality, and psychosocial environment to address adolescent nutritional health comprehensively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Research of Social Science Economics and Management
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v4i10.818
Primary Topic
Sports and Physical Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship Between Stress Levels and Carbohydrate Intake with The Nutritional Status of Students of SMPN 22 Surakarta

Lubna Salsabila, Firmansyah Firmansyah, Nur Lathifah Mardiyati
Journal Research of Social Science Economics and Management
Sports and Physical Education Research
article

The Relationship Between Stress Levels and Carbohydrate Intake with The Nutritional Status of Students of SMPN 22 Surakarta

Lubna Salsabila, Firmansyah Firmansyah, Nur Lathifah Mardiyati
article en

Abstract

Multifactorial elements, including psychological and dietary factors such as stress levels and carbohydrate intake, influence adolescent nutritional status. This study analyzed the relationship between stress and carbohydrate intake with the nutritional status of 9th-grade students at SMPN 22 Surakarta. Using a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 141 randomly selected students. Stress levels were measured using the DASS-21 questionnaire, carbohydrate intake was assessed through a 24-hour recall over three non-consecutive days, and nutritional status was evaluated via BMI-for-age (BMI/U) z-scores. Results indicated that students with poor nutritional status exhibited higher severe stress (28.6%) and lower carbohydrate intake (10.8%). Conversely, students with better nutritional status reported moderate stress (22.7%) and higher carbohydrate intake (25%). However, bivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant relationship between stress levels and nutritional status (p=0.714), nor between carbohydrate intake and nutritional status (p=0.676). These findings suggest that stress and carbohydrate intake alone are insufficient predictors of adolescent nutritional status. Further research should investigate other influencing factors such as physical activity, overall dietary patterns, sleep quality, and psychosocial environment to address adolescent nutritional health comprehensively.

Journal Research of Social Science Economics and ManagementVol. 4(10)
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Sports and Physical Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.