Design for automated disassembly: a comparative study of different battery component designs

The feasibility of automated disassembly at a product’s end-of-life stage strongly depends on its design. This relationship is particularly relevant for electric vehicle batteries, for which other design requirements are typically given priority. Consequently, the potential for automated disassembly varies between different battery designs and between the different components. This study investigates the potential for automated disassembly of five EV battery designs currently available on the market. These batteries are subject to disassembly experiments, during which a criteria catalogue is employed to semi-quantitatively compare the individual design characteristics of each individual component. The results of this assessment indicate that the complexity involved in automatically disassembling the components generally increases with the depth of disassembly. Nevertheless, the initial step of the system cover removal appears to be of high importance. It is further identified that the steps involved in the removal of cooling systems, the separation of module housing parts and the cell connector separation are the most critical during disassembly. Based on these findings specific design guidelines are proposed from the best evaluation results of the five disassembly analyses performed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sustainable Engineering
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2025.2504388
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design for automated disassembly: a comparative study of different battery component designs

Thomas Vietor, Merle Zorn, Mark Mennenga, S. D. Hansen et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Sustainable Engineering
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
3.73
article

Design for automated disassembly: a comparative study of different battery component designs

Thomas Vietor, Merle Zorn, Mark Mennenga, S. D. Hansen, Michael A. Danzer, Frank Döpper, Tom Rüther, Christina Ionescu, Jan C. Deeken, Sabine Flamme, Gregor Ohnemüller, Christoph Herrmann
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The feasibility of automated disassembly at a product’s end-of-life stage strongly depends on its design. This relationship is particularly relevant for electric vehicle batteries, for which other design requirements are typically given priority. Consequently, the potential for automated disassembly varies between different battery designs and between the different components. This study investigates the potential for automated disassembly of five EV battery designs currently available on the market. These batteries are subject to disassembly experiments, during which a criteria catalogue is employed to semi-quantitatively compare the individual design characteristics of each individual component. The results of this assessment indicate that the complexity involved in automatically disassembling the components generally increases with the depth of disassembly. Nevertheless, the initial step of the system cover removal appears to be of high importance. It is further identified that the steps involved in the removal of cooling systems, the separation of module housing parts and the cell connector separation are the most critical during disassembly. Based on these findings specific design guidelines are proposed from the best evaluation results of the five disassembly analyses performed.

International Journal of Sustainable EngineeringVol. 18(1)
SmartFactory (Germany) (DE), University of Bayreuth (DE), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.