Why Language Matters: A Qualitative Inquiry Into the Implications of Language Used During Provider-Patient Interactions on University Students’ Perceptions and Understandings of Their Own Mental Health

Language surrounding mental health has been utilised to mechanise and normalise stigma. Associated connotations of prejudice can deter individuals from accessing critical support. There are few studies investigating use of language within clinical contexts. This paper investigates implications of language used during provider-patient interactions in shaping patients’ understandings of their mental health. Semi-structured, online interviews were conducted with ten university students with previously obtained mental health diagnoses or treatment. Interpretative phenomenological analysis identified three core themes: impact of navigating complex language and services on diagnostic experiences; a lack of person centred care as dehumanising; existing prejudices of the individual and others impact experiences of ill mental health. Results suggested clinical language can be emotive, acting as either a barrier or enabler to sense making of mental health diagnoses. This research can translate to operational language use guidelines in clinical settings, ultimately contributing to patient well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Language and Communication
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2025-0009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Language Matters: A Qualitative Inquiry Into the Implications of Language Used During Provider-Patient Interactions on University Students’ Perceptions and Understandings of Their Own Mental Health

Lauren Powell, Elizabeth Jane Colbert
2 citations
Psychology of Language and Communication
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
20.85
article

Why Language Matters: A Qualitative Inquiry Into the Implications of Language Used During Provider-Patient Interactions on University Students’ Perceptions and Understandings of Their Own Mental Health

Lauren Powell, Elizabeth Jane Colbert
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Language surrounding mental health has been utilised to mechanise and normalise stigma. Associated connotations of prejudice can deter individuals from accessing critical support. There are few studies investigating use of language within clinical contexts. This paper investigates implications of language used during provider-patient interactions in shaping patients’ understandings of their mental health. Semi-structured, online interviews were conducted with ten university students with previously obtained mental health diagnoses or treatment. Interpretative phenomenological analysis identified three core themes: impact of navigating complex language and services on diagnostic experiences; a lack of person centred care as dehumanising; existing prejudices of the individual and others impact experiences of ill mental health. Results suggested clinical language can be emotive, acting as either a barrier or enabler to sense making of mental health diagnoses. This research can translate to operational language use guidelines in clinical settings, ultimately contributing to patient well-being.

Psychology of Language and Communication
University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
20.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.