Hybrid internal auditing: will communication mode and message reprocessibility affect managers’ willingness to share knowledge with internal auditors?

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how communication mode and message reprocessibility influence managers’ intentions to share knowledge with an internal auditor. The authors investigate three modes (e-mail, videoconference and face-to-face) and two levels of message reprocessibility (recorded and not recorded). Design/methodology/approach The study uses an experiment with a 2 × 2 + 1 design with communication mode and message reprocessibility variables randomly assigned to 243 participants. The study also includes an open-ended question on how communication mode and message reprocessibility affect knowledge sharing with an internal auditor. Findings Results from the experiment identify that managers are more likely to share knowledge with internal auditors when the communication mode is high in media richness (face-to-face or videoconference) than low in media richness (e-mail). Message reprocessibility does not significantly influence managers’ intentions to share knowledge. Additionally, responses to an open-ended question identify that managers have differing views on how message reprocessibility and communication mode influence knowledge sharing, which provides an avenue for future research. Originality/value This study examines the communication mode of the manager (not the auditor) on knowledge sharing. In addition, the investigation of message reprocessibility within an audit setting is unique to this study. Our results inform internal auditors’ selection of communication mode and decision to record communications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Auditing Journal
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-05-2024-4324
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid internal auditing: will communication mode and message reprocessibility affect managers’ willingness to share knowledge with internal auditors?

Megan Seymore, Rebecca J Wetmiller
Managerial Auditing Journal
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Hybrid internal auditing: will communication mode and message reprocessibility affect managers’ willingness to share knowledge with internal auditors?

Megan Seymore, Rebecca J Wetmiller
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how communication mode and message reprocessibility influence managers’ intentions to share knowledge with an internal auditor. The authors investigate three modes (e-mail, videoconference and face-to-face) and two levels of message reprocessibility (recorded and not recorded). Design/methodology/approach The study uses an experiment with a 2 × 2 + 1 design with communication mode and message reprocessibility variables randomly assigned to 243 participants. The study also includes an open-ended question on how communication mode and message reprocessibility affect knowledge sharing with an internal auditor. Findings Results from the experiment identify that managers are more likely to share knowledge with internal auditors when the communication mode is high in media richness (face-to-face or videoconference) than low in media richness (e-mail). Message reprocessibility does not significantly influence managers’ intentions to share knowledge. Additionally, responses to an open-ended question identify that managers have differing views on how message reprocessibility and communication mode influence knowledge sharing, which provides an avenue for future research. Originality/value This study examines the communication mode of the manager (not the auditor) on knowledge sharing. In addition, the investigation of message reprocessibility within an audit setting is unique to this study. Our results inform internal auditors’ selection of communication mode and decision to record communications.

Managerial Auditing JournalVol. 40(5)
Longwood University (US), Ohio University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.