Specificity of didactics and the organizational basis of different physical education lesson models for students of higher educational institutions

Students’ physical training in the conditions of modern society's transformation requires new forms and approaches to the educational process. Research on the specificity of didactics and the organizational basis of existing models of physical education gives an opportunity to identify the positive and negative aspects of educational practices and to determine problem areas for further research. The article provides the author’s research vector of traditional and optional models for physical education in the context of its comparison and determination of further optimization. Thus, the goal of this research is the analysis and grading of specifications of organizational models of students’ physical education in the context of functional and didactic prerequisites. The following parameters of the educational process of students’ physical education models have been selected for comparing the effectiveness of the stated models: presence and dynamics of the student’s motor experience; physical fitness (based on motor tests); attendance of practical classes (as an indicator of desired volume of motor activity and mediated factor of motivation). In the research process, we discovered a deficit in the criteria for objective comparison of the effectiveness of said models. Despite this setback, analysis of the received materials by the given parameters led us to the following conclusions: The acquisition of motor experience using an optional model has a fragmentary character, and the traditional has a more extended and generalized one; More positive dynamics of separate elements of physical fitness by traditional approach if not essential; The statistics of practical class attendance in comparison, lead to a conclusion that popular opinion about the advantage of the optional model in motivational influence is unfounded. Overall, both educational models have pros and cons. Based on the results of the list of factors, the traditional model of the educational process is more viable because of the systemic approach, but it has its cons.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Series 15 Scientific and pedagogical problems of physical culture (physical culture and sports)
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31392/udu-nc.series15.2025.05(192).11
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Training Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specificity of didactics and the organizational basis of different physical education lesson models for students of higher educational institutions

Tatiana V. Rakitina, І. В. Лукашова, Ivan Vrzhesnevskyi, Volodimir Bobr et al.
Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Series 15 Scientific and pedagogical problems of physical culture (physical culture and sports)
Physical Education and Training Studies
article

Specificity of didactics and the organizational basis of different physical education lesson models for students of higher educational institutions

Tatiana V. Rakitina, І. В. Лукашова, Ivan Vrzhesnevskyi, Volodimir Bobr, Yuriy Yanishevsky
article en

Abstract

Students’ physical training in the conditions of modern society's transformation requires new forms and approaches to the educational process. Research on the specificity of didactics and the organizational basis of existing models of physical education gives an opportunity to identify the positive and negative aspects of educational practices and to determine problem areas for further research. The article provides the author’s research vector of traditional and optional models for physical education in the context of its comparison and determination of further optimization. Thus, the goal of this research is the analysis and grading of specifications of organizational models of students’ physical education in the context of functional and didactic prerequisites. The following parameters of the educational process of students’ physical education models have been selected for comparing the effectiveness of the stated models: presence and dynamics of the student’s motor experience; physical fitness (based on motor tests); attendance of practical classes (as an indicator of desired volume of motor activity and mediated factor of motivation). In the research process, we discovered a deficit in the criteria for objective comparison of the effectiveness of said models. Despite this setback, analysis of the received materials by the given parameters led us to the following conclusions: The acquisition of motor experience using an optional model has a fragmentary character, and the traditional has a more extended and generalized one; More positive dynamics of separate elements of physical fitness by traditional approach if not essential; The statistics of practical class attendance in comparison, lead to a conclusion that popular opinion about the advantage of the optional model in motivational influence is unfounded. Overall, both educational models have pros and cons. Based on the results of the list of factors, the traditional model of the educational process is more viable because of the systemic approach, but it has its cons.

Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Series 15 Scientific and pedagogical problems of physical culture (physical culture and sports)(5(192))
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Physical Education and Training Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.