Factors affecting detection probabilities of acoustic transmitters using passive receivers

Passive acoustic telemetry is a common tool used to study fish movements. Range tests, or determining the distance at which transmitters can be recognized by a receiver, are needed to accurately determine fish position in the environment. However, range tests are not often conducted or are only completed during a single season prior to an acoustic telemetry study commencing though seasonality may affect detection probabilities over a multi-year study’s duration. Therefore, we conducted a series of tests to assess the effect of seasonality on range detection over a 3-year period on Lewis and Clark Lake, a Missouri River reservoir. Specifically, we measured the effects that seasonal environmental (e.g., wind, depth, temperature) factors had on detection probability at a range of distances using Innovasea V13 acoustic transmitters at 14 VR2tx 69-kHz passive receivers. These data were used to inform array design for a concurrent acoustic telemetry research project. We accounted for spatiotemporal variation in detection probability by evaluating monthly detection probabilities across years from March–September during 2022–2024. Mean detection probability for Lewis and Clark Lake receivers from range tests was 0. 60 for 50 m, 0.50 for 100 m, 0.37 for 200 m, 0.23 for 400 m, 0.15 for 600 m, and 0.11 for 800 m. We found detection probabilities in the spring were greater than those in the other seasons. We found negative relationships between detection probabilities and distance between the tag and receiver, wind speed, inflow through Fort Randall Dam, and tag depth. Further, we found detection probabilities varied with river kilometer, presumably due to habitat differences. Implications of our findings include consideration of lower realized detection probabilities (i.e., resulting from environmental factors) compared to equipment capabilities during study design, and the consideration of both anthropogenic influences (i.e., inflow) and natural environmental factors (i.e., wind) that affect detection probabilities. The receiver array in Lewis and Clark Lake, South Dakota was modified due to the findings presented herein, in that receivers were stationed in nearshore locations presumably sheltered from the wind. In general, our data support placing receiver stations nearer to shore and protected from wind fetch to the best extent possible to optimize detection distance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Biotelemetry
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-025-00411-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors affecting detection probabilities of acoustic transmitters using passive receivers

Christopher M. Longhenry, C. Engel, William J. Radigan, Phil Chvala et al.
2 citations
Animal Biotelemetry
Speech and Audio Processing
2.97
article

Factors affecting detection probabilities of acoustic transmitters using passive receivers

Christopher M. Longhenry, C. Engel, William J. Radigan, Phil Chvala, Mark A. Pegg
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Passive acoustic telemetry is a common tool used to study fish movements. Range tests, or determining the distance at which transmitters can be recognized by a receiver, are needed to accurately determine fish position in the environment. However, range tests are not often conducted or are only completed during a single season prior to an acoustic telemetry study commencing though seasonality may affect detection probabilities over a multi-year study’s duration. Therefore, we conducted a series of tests to assess the effect of seasonality on range detection over a 3-year period on Lewis and Clark Lake, a Missouri River reservoir. Specifically, we measured the effects that seasonal environmental (e.g., wind, depth, temperature) factors had on detection probability at a range of distances using Innovasea V13 acoustic transmitters at 14 VR2tx 69-kHz passive receivers. These data were used to inform array design for a concurrent acoustic telemetry research project. We accounted for spatiotemporal variation in detection probability by evaluating monthly detection probabilities across years from March–September during 2022–2024. Mean detection probability for Lewis and Clark Lake receivers from range tests was 0. 60 for 50 m, 0.50 for 100 m, 0.37 for 200 m, 0.23 for 400 m, 0.15 for 600 m, and 0.11 for 800 m. We found detection probabilities in the spring were greater than those in the other seasons. We found negative relationships between detection probabilities and distance between the tag and receiver, wind speed, inflow through Fort Randall Dam, and tag depth. Further, we found detection probabilities varied with river kilometer, presumably due to habitat differences. Implications of our findings include consideration of lower realized detection probabilities (i.e., resulting from environmental factors) compared to equipment capabilities during study design, and the consideration of both anthropogenic influences (i.e., inflow) and natural environmental factors (i.e., wind) that affect detection probabilities. The receiver array in Lewis and Clark Lake, South Dakota was modified due to the findings presented herein, in that receivers were stationed in nearshore locations presumably sheltered from the wind. In general, our data support placing receiver stations nearer to shore and protected from wind fetch to the best extent possible to optimize detection distance.

Animal BiotelemetryVol. 13(1)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Nebraska Game and Parks Commission (US), North Dakota Game and Fish Department (US)
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Speech and Audio Processing
2.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.