Membrane equilibration for in situ dissolved gas instrumentation: a comparison of four approaches

Many in situ dissolved gas instruments use a membrane inlet to extract gas from water enabling measurement in the gas phase. However, mass transport across membranes is slow, making it difficult to build instruments with fast time responses. Several approaches exist to improve time response, including pulling vacuum to enhance gas flux, but the trade-offs between different approaches are unclear. Starting from first principles, we present a set of analytical models describing the operation of four different approaches for operating a membrane-based dissolved gas instrument. Using these models, we obtain the steady state and dynamic performance characteristics of each approach, and identify design trade-offs between speed, sensitivity, and complexity. Insights from these models enable physics-based design decisions and design optimization instead of instrument designers needing to rely on empirical methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frmst.2025.1488800
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Membrane equilibration for in situ dissolved gas instrumentation: a comparison of four approaches

Beckett C. Colson, Anna P. M. Michel
1 citations
Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
1.79
article

Membrane equilibration for in situ dissolved gas instrumentation: a comparison of four approaches

Beckett C. Colson, Anna P. M. Michel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Many in situ dissolved gas instruments use a membrane inlet to extract gas from water enabling measurement in the gas phase. However, mass transport across membranes is slow, making it difficult to build instruments with fast time responses. Several approaches exist to improve time response, including pulling vacuum to enhance gas flux, but the trade-offs between different approaches are unclear. Starting from first principles, we present a set of analytical models describing the operation of four different approaches for operating a membrane-based dissolved gas instrument. Using these models, we obtain the steady state and dynamic performance characteristics of each approach, and identify design trade-offs between speed, sensitivity, and complexity. Insights from these models enable physics-based design decisions and design optimization instead of instrument designers needing to rely on empirical methods.

Frontiers in Membrane Science and TechnologyVol. 4
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
National Science Foundation, Division of Earth Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Membrane equilibration for in situ dissolved gas instrumentation: a comparison of four approaches — Beckett C. Colson, Anna P. M. Michel · Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS