Engaging second language (L2) students with synchronous written corrective feedback in technology-enhanced learning contexts: A mixed-methods study

While there is a growing body of studies on written corrective feedback (WCF) in current literature, little is known about how L2 learners attend to synchronous WCF (SWCF), an innovation of providing WCF, and what factors influence their engagement. To fill the gaps, our study examined L2 learners’ affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement with such a practice, and the factors contributing to their engagement in the Chinese EFL contexts. Drawing upon a mixed-methods approach, our study comprised two phases (survey study and in-depth study) and collected data from multiple sources including questionnaires, students’ revised drafts of writing, teacher SWCF, semi-structured interviews, and writing journals. The results from survey study and in-depth study showed that Chinese EFL learners generally displayed positive engagement with SWCF in affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions, and their engagement was influenced by factors related to students significantly. Specifically, factors including students’ English proficiency, enjoyment of English learning, digital literacy, beliefs about SWCF, and teacher-student relationships were found to mediate whether students could make full use of SWCF and reap benefits from it. The findings of our study contribute to a fine-grained understanding of how learners attended to SWCF from the three perspectives and generate useful implications for promoting their engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05007-3
Citations
3
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging second language (L2) students with synchronous written corrective feedback in technology-enhanced learning contexts: A mixed-methods study

Jinfen Xu, Xiaolong Cheng
3 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
31.27
article

Engaging second language (L2) students with synchronous written corrective feedback in technology-enhanced learning contexts: A mixed-methods study

Jinfen Xu, Xiaolong Cheng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

While there is a growing body of studies on written corrective feedback (WCF) in current literature, little is known about how L2 learners attend to synchronous WCF (SWCF), an innovation of providing WCF, and what factors influence their engagement. To fill the gaps, our study examined L2 learners’ affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement with such a practice, and the factors contributing to their engagement in the Chinese EFL contexts. Drawing upon a mixed-methods approach, our study comprised two phases (survey study and in-depth study) and collected data from multiple sources including questionnaires, students’ revised drafts of writing, teacher SWCF, semi-structured interviews, and writing journals. The results from survey study and in-depth study showed that Chinese EFL learners generally displayed positive engagement with SWCF in affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions, and their engagement was influenced by factors related to students significantly. Specifically, factors including students’ English proficiency, enjoyment of English learning, digital literacy, beliefs about SWCF, and teacher-student relationships were found to mediate whether students could make full use of SWCF and reap benefits from it. The findings of our study contribute to a fine-grained understanding of how learners attended to SWCF from the three perspectives and generate useful implications for promoting their engagement.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), Hubei University of Technology (CN)
Hubei Provincial Department of Education, Hubei University of Technology, Hubei University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
31.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.