Extreme gradient boosting with Shapley Additive Explanations for landslide susceptibility at slope unit and hydrological response unit scales

• Hydrological Response Units (HRU) was used as mapping unit and compared with the result of Slope Units (SU). • Employed Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) combined Hyper parameter tuning with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) algorithm. • HRUs performing better than SUs across all evaluated metrics for land susceptibility mapping. This study provides an in-depth comparative evaluation of landslide susceptibility using two distinct spatial units: and slope units (SUs) and hydrological response units (HRUs), within Goesan County, South Korea. Leveraging the capabilities of the extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm combined with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), this work assesses the precision and clarity with which each unit predicts areas vulnerable to landslides. SUs focus on the geomorphological features like ridges and valleys, focusing on slope stability and landslide triggers. Conversely, HRUs are established based on a variety of hydrological factors, including land cover, soil type and slope gradients, to encapsulate the dynamic water processes of the region. The methodological framework includes the systematic gathering, preparation and analysis of data, ranging from historical landslide occurrences to topographical and environmental variables like elevation, slope angle and land curvature etc. The XGB algorithm used to construct the Landslide Susceptibility Model (LSM) was combined with SHAP for model interpretation and the results were evaluated using Random Cross-validation (RCV) to ensure accuracy and reliability. To ensure optimal model performance, the XGB algorithm’s hyperparameters were tuned using Differential Evolution, considering multicollinearity-free variables. The results show that SU and HRU are effective for LSM, but their effectiveness varies depending on landscape characteristics. The XGB algorithm demonstrates strong predictive power and SHAP enhances model transparency of the influential variables involved. This work underscores the importance of selecting appropriate assessment units tailored to specific landscape characteristics for accurate LSM. The integration of advanced machine learning techniques with interpretative tools offers a robust framework for landslide susceptibility assessment, improving both predictive capabilities and model interpretability. Future research should integrate broader data sets and explore hybrid analytical models to strengthen the generalizability of these findings across varied geographical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscience Frontiers
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102081
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extreme gradient boosting with Shapley Additive Explanations for landslide susceptibility at slope unit and hydrological response unit scales

Hyuck‐Jin Park, Ananta Man Singh Pradhan, Pramit Ghimire, Ji-Sung Lee et al.
6 citations
Geoscience Frontiers
Landslides and related hazards
14.53
article

Extreme gradient boosting with Shapley Additive Explanations for landslide susceptibility at slope unit and hydrological response unit scales

Hyuck‐Jin Park, Ananta Man Singh Pradhan, Pramit Ghimire, Ji-Sung Lee, Suchita Shrestha, Jung-Hyun Lee
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Hydrological Response Units (HRU) was used as mapping unit and compared with the result of Slope Units (SU). • Employed Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) combined Hyper parameter tuning with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) algorithm. • HRUs performing better than SUs across all evaluated metrics for land susceptibility mapping. This study provides an in-depth comparative evaluation of landslide susceptibility using two distinct spatial units: and slope units (SUs) and hydrological response units (HRUs), within Goesan County, South Korea. Leveraging the capabilities of the extreme gradient boosting (XGB) algorithm combined with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), this work assesses the precision and clarity with which each unit predicts areas vulnerable to landslides. SUs focus on the geomorphological features like ridges and valleys, focusing on slope stability and landslide triggers. Conversely, HRUs are established based on a variety of hydrological factors, including land cover, soil type and slope gradients, to encapsulate the dynamic water processes of the region. The methodological framework includes the systematic gathering, preparation and analysis of data, ranging from historical landslide occurrences to topographical and environmental variables like elevation, slope angle and land curvature etc. The XGB algorithm used to construct the Landslide Susceptibility Model (LSM) was combined with SHAP for model interpretation and the results were evaluated using Random Cross-validation (RCV) to ensure accuracy and reliability. To ensure optimal model performance, the XGB algorithm’s hyperparameters were tuned using Differential Evolution, considering multicollinearity-free variables. The results show that SU and HRU are effective for LSM, but their effectiveness varies depending on landscape characteristics. The XGB algorithm demonstrates strong predictive power and SHAP enhances model transparency of the influential variables involved. This work underscores the importance of selecting appropriate assessment units tailored to specific landscape characteristics for accurate LSM. The integration of advanced machine learning techniques with interpretative tools offers a robust framework for landslide susceptibility assessment, improving both predictive capabilities and model interpretability. Future research should integrate broader data sets and explore hybrid analytical models to strengthen the generalizability of these findings across varied geographical settings.

Geoscience FrontiersVol. 16(4)
Tribhuvan University (NP), Government of Nepal (NP), Sejong University (KR), Korea Environment Institute (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Landslides and related hazards
14.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.