Development of quality indicators for a community pharmacy setting
This study demonstrates the use of the RAM combined with the DI to establish consensus on healthcare quality measures, i.e. QIs for community pharmacy services. Our findings indicate that the number of QIs considered acceptable is strongly impacted by the method chosen to handle disagreement in the ratings. Incorporating DI and conventional RAM disagreement calculations reduced the number of QIs deemed acceptable by half.
Authors
- Ann Helen Jakobsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-1606)
- Kjell H. Halvorsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1562-1822)
- Kenji Fujita (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-6004)
- Noriko Sato (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-8376)
- Lars Småbrekke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-3368)
- Timothy F. Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4189-8403)
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
- Published
- 2025-05-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riaf030
- Primary Topic
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd