Recognition of the validity of administrative agreements in regional harmonization legislation

The rapid development of regional economic integration has brought unprecedented challenges to administrative governance across different jurisdictions. This paper explores the validity determination of administrative agreements within regional collaborative legislation frameworks, focusing on the Yangtze River Delta, Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle, and Yellow River Basin. By integrating administrative law principles with regional legislative mechanisms, we develop a comprehensive analytical model for validity assessment, represented as (E=f(L,R,C)), incorporating legality (L), rationality (R), and contractual nature (C). Empirical analysis of 157 judicial decisions from 2019-2024 reveals that our model significantly improves consistency and efficiency in validity determinations, reducing regional disparities by 37.4% and processing times by up to 32%. This study highlights the importance of standardized validity criteria and adaptive regional mechanisms in enhancing judicial consistency and supporting effective cross-jurisdictional governance. Our findings suggest that dynamic adjustment and quantitative assessment frameworks can provide robust solutions to the challenges of regional collaborative legislation, ensuring both legal uniformity and local governance adaptability.

Publication Details

Journal
Science of Law Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2025.040216
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognition of the validity of administrative agreements in regional harmonization legislation

Science of Law Journal
European and International Law Studies
article

Recognition of the validity of administrative agreements in regional harmonization legislation

article en

Abstract

The rapid development of regional economic integration has brought unprecedented challenges to administrative governance across different jurisdictions. This paper explores the validity determination of administrative agreements within regional collaborative legislation frameworks, focusing on the Yangtze River Delta, Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle, and Yellow River Basin. By integrating administrative law principles with regional legislative mechanisms, we develop a comprehensive analytical model for validity assessment, represented as (E=f(L,R,C)), incorporating legality (L), rationality (R), and contractual nature (C). Empirical analysis of 157 judicial decisions from 2019-2024 reveals that our model significantly improves consistency and efficiency in validity determinations, reducing regional disparities by 37.4% and processing times by up to 32%. This study highlights the importance of standardized validity criteria and adaptive regional mechanisms in enhancing judicial consistency and supporting effective cross-jurisdictional governance. Our findings suggest that dynamic adjustment and quantitative assessment frameworks can provide robust solutions to the challenges of regional collaborative legislation, ensuring both legal uniformity and local governance adaptability.

Science of Law JournalVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recognition of the validity of administrative agreements in regional harmonization legislation · Science of Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS