From production to market; enhancing food security through efficient mushroom distribution: A study of energy and economic evaluations

• The study evaluates the effects of packaged and bulk distribution methods on mushroom quality and efficiency. • Energy consumption and output were compared between the two distribution methods. • Compost was the primary energy-consuming input in both methods. • Bulk distribution showed higher energy output than packaged distribution. • Packaged distribution demonstrated a higher benefit-cost ratio. • The technical efficiency of the production process was assessed. • Distribution methods significantly impacted mushroom quality, particularly color and weight loss. . Considering the significance of food security as a global challenge, access to sufficient and high-quality food resources is essential. Edible mushrooms, due to their rich protein and caloric content, play a crucial role in meeting nutritional needs. This study aims to evaluate the qualitative, energy-economic, and technical efficiency aspects of two mushroom distribution methods—packaged and bulk—in the production chain. Data were collected from 35 button mushroom production units in Khuzestan province through questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. The results showed that the total energy consumption for packaged and bulk distribution was 66,664 MJm −2 and 63,572 MJm −2 , respectively, while the total energy output was 13.36 MJm −2 and 30.96 MJm −2 . Compost was identified as the primary energy-consuming input, accounting for 72.08% in the packaged method and 76.12% in the bulk method. Diesel fuel ranked second in energy consumption. The energy ratio was calculated as 0.05 for packaged distribution and 0.06 for bulk distribution. Additionally, the total revenue for packaged and bulk methods was 5,608.69$ and 2,279.26$ per 100m −2 , while production costs were 1,747.25$ and 1,356.70$ per 100m −2 , respectively. The benefit-cost ratio was 3.21 for packaged distribution and 1.68 for bulk distribution. The mean technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency were estimated at 0.950, 0.910, and 0.958, respectively. Data analysis revealed that mushroom quality (color) was significantly affected on the fourth, sixth, and seventh days, while weight loss was significant on all days except the seventh. Bulk distribution exhibited the most significant color change on the fifth and seventh days and the highest weight reduction on the first and fifth days.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105442
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From production to market; enhancing food security through efficient mushroom distribution: A study of energy and economic evaluations

Mahmoud Ghasemi-Nejad-Raeini, Morteza Taki, Mina Shafei Galeh
3 citations
Results in Engineering
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.15
article

From production to market; enhancing food security through efficient mushroom distribution: A study of energy and economic evaluations

Mahmoud Ghasemi-Nejad-Raeini, Morteza Taki, Mina Shafei Galeh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• The study evaluates the effects of packaged and bulk distribution methods on mushroom quality and efficiency. • Energy consumption and output were compared between the two distribution methods. • Compost was the primary energy-consuming input in both methods. • Bulk distribution showed higher energy output than packaged distribution. • Packaged distribution demonstrated a higher benefit-cost ratio. • The technical efficiency of the production process was assessed. • Distribution methods significantly impacted mushroom quality, particularly color and weight loss. . Considering the significance of food security as a global challenge, access to sufficient and high-quality food resources is essential. Edible mushrooms, due to their rich protein and caloric content, play a crucial role in meeting nutritional needs. This study aims to evaluate the qualitative, energy-economic, and technical efficiency aspects of two mushroom distribution methods—packaged and bulk—in the production chain. Data were collected from 35 button mushroom production units in Khuzestan province through questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. The results showed that the total energy consumption for packaged and bulk distribution was 66,664 MJm −2 and 63,572 MJm −2 , respectively, while the total energy output was 13.36 MJm −2 and 30.96 MJm −2 . Compost was identified as the primary energy-consuming input, accounting for 72.08% in the packaged method and 76.12% in the bulk method. Diesel fuel ranked second in energy consumption. The energy ratio was calculated as 0.05 for packaged distribution and 0.06 for bulk distribution. Additionally, the total revenue for packaged and bulk methods was 5,608.69$ and 2,279.26$ per 100m −2 , while production costs were 1,747.25$ and 1,356.70$ per 100m −2 , respectively. The benefit-cost ratio was 3.21 for packaged distribution and 1.68 for bulk distribution. The mean technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, and scale efficiency were estimated at 0.950, 0.910, and 0.958, respectively. Data analysis revealed that mushroom quality (color) was significantly affected on the fourth, sixth, and seventh days, while weight loss was significant on all days except the seventh. Bulk distribution exhibited the most significant color change on the fifth and seventh days and the highest weight reduction on the first and fifth days.

Results in EngineeringVol. 26
Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.