Bark Stripping Damage Caused by Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.): Inventory Design Using Hansen–Hurwitz and Horvitz–Thompson Approach

This study investigates the use of adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) for estimating bark stripping damage in forests, employing the Hansen–Hurwitz (HH) and Horvitz–Thompson (HT) estimators. Through simulations, we analysed the total, summer, and new bark stripping damage with varying grid sizes and sample sizes in eight full-censused stands in Northern Styria/Austria. The results showed that the HT estimator consistently had lower standard errors (SEs) (variability of the sample mean from the true population mean) than the HH estimator. SEs decreased with increasing grid space for new and summer damages, but increased for total damage up to 35 m, then remained stable. Inclusion probabilities (IP) were highest for total damage. ACS showed precision gains, particularly for rare and clustered damages like new damage, but did not achieve the target SE of 10%. Adaptive sampling is most beneficial for monitoring rare and clustered events, though precision remains limited, especially for new damage. The study suggests ACS is suitable for rare damage types (e.g., summer and new bark stripping wounds) but requires further refinement to meet operational precision targets. Future work should focus on integrating adaptive designs with practical field methods, such as fixed-radius plots and refined damage criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060890
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bark Stripping Damage Caused by Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.): Inventory Design Using Hansen–Hurwitz and Horvitz–Thompson Approach

Sonja Vospernik, Christoph Hahn
1 links
Forests
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Bark Stripping Damage Caused by Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.): Inventory Design Using Hansen–Hurwitz and Horvitz–Thompson Approach

Sonja Vospernik, Christoph Hahn
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the use of adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) for estimating bark stripping damage in forests, employing the Hansen–Hurwitz (HH) and Horvitz–Thompson (HT) estimators. Through simulations, we analysed the total, summer, and new bark stripping damage with varying grid sizes and sample sizes in eight full-censused stands in Northern Styria/Austria. The results showed that the HT estimator consistently had lower standard errors (SEs) (variability of the sample mean from the true population mean) than the HH estimator. SEs decreased with increasing grid space for new and summer damages, but increased for total damage up to 35 m, then remained stable. Inclusion probabilities (IP) were highest for total damage. ACS showed precision gains, particularly for rare and clustered damages like new damage, but did not achieve the target SE of 10%. Adaptive sampling is most beneficial for monitoring rare and clustered events, though precision remains limited, especially for new damage. The study suggests ACS is suitable for rare damage types (e.g., summer and new bark stripping wounds) but requires further refinement to meet operational precision targets. Future work should focus on integrating adaptive designs with practical field methods, such as fixed-radius plots and refined damage criteria.

ForestsVol. 16(6)
BOKU University (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.