Technique and Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation of Biopsy-Proven 3–4 cm T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma

<b>Objective:</b> The American Urological Association recommends ablation as an alternative treatment option for T1a RCC smaller than 3 cm. Our objective is to describe our technique and evaluate the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for biopsy-proven T1a RCC measuring 3-4 cm, compared to outcomes for tumors <3 cm. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A single-center, retrospective review included patients with solitary, de novo, biopsy-proven T1a RCC who underwent RFA between January 2001 and December 2020. Using propensity score matching, patients with 3-4 cm lesions (Group A) were matched with patients with lesions less than 3 cm (Group B) based on the pathology, grade, duration of follow-up, another primary malignancy, age, and sex. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan and Meier product-limit estimator, and both groups were compared. <b>Results:</b> A total of 122 patients were included in the matched analyses. Eight patients were missing data on disease recurrence, leaving 114 patients with data on RFS and DFS (55 patients in Group A and 59 patients in Group B). The median tumor size in groups A and B was 3.3 cm and 2.2 cm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate (<i>p</i> = 0.11) and local recurrence at the ablation site (<i>p</i> = 0.15). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (<i>p</i> = 0.93), recurrence-free survival (<i>p</i> = 0.45), or disease-free survival (<i>p</i> = 0.37). The metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 100% in both groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> RFA is a highly effective modality for the treatment of 3-4 cm T1a RCC, with long-term favorable oncologic and survival outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13061296
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technique and Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation of Biopsy-Proven 3–4 cm T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma

Mohamed E. Abdelsalam, Kamran Ahrar, Roland L. Bassett, Bruno Calazans Odisio et al.
Biomedicines
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Technique and Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation of Biopsy-Proven 3–4 cm T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma

Mohamed E. Abdelsalam, Kamran Ahrar, Roland L. Bassett, Bruno Calazans Odisio, Peiman Habibollahi, David Irwin, José A. Karam, Ketan Y. Shah, Surena F. Matin, Ahmed Awad, Thomas Lu
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> The American Urological Association recommends ablation as an alternative treatment option for T1a RCC smaller than 3 cm. Our objective is to describe our technique and evaluate the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for biopsy-proven T1a RCC measuring 3-4 cm, compared to outcomes for tumors <3 cm. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A single-center, retrospective review included patients with solitary, de novo, biopsy-proven T1a RCC who underwent RFA between January 2001 and December 2020. Using propensity score matching, patients with 3-4 cm lesions (Group A) were matched with patients with lesions less than 3 cm (Group B) based on the pathology, grade, duration of follow-up, another primary malignancy, age, and sex. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan and Meier product-limit estimator, and both groups were compared. <b>Results:</b> A total of 122 patients were included in the matched analyses. Eight patients were missing data on disease recurrence, leaving 114 patients with data on RFS and DFS (55 patients in Group A and 59 patients in Group B). The median tumor size in groups A and B was 3.3 cm and 2.2 cm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate (<i>p</i> = 0.11) and local recurrence at the ablation site (<i>p</i> = 0.15). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (<i>p</i> = 0.93), recurrence-free survival (<i>p</i> = 0.45), or disease-free survival (<i>p</i> = 0.37). The metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 100% in both groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> RFA is a highly effective modality for the treatment of 3-4 cm T1a RCC, with long-term favorable oncologic and survival outcomes.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(6)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.